* [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point
[not found] <bug-34422-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2015-06-10 18:12 ` egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
2020-11-20 22:43 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu @ 2015-06-10 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
Eric Gallager <egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager <egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> fixed point support is only currently supported for the MIPS target.
So could the configure script error out earlier, then, if it is passed
--enable-fixed-point for a target other than MIPS?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point
[not found] <bug-34422-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-06-10 18:12 ` [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
@ 2020-11-20 22:43 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-24 15:07 ` [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point (configure should reject --enable-fixed-point on platforms that don't support it) egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-11-20 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sbenzel at acm dot org
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 97916 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point (configure should reject --enable-fixed-point on platforms that don't support it)
[not found] <bug-34422-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-06-10 18:12 ` [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
2020-11-20 22:43 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-24 15:07 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-24 15:19 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-24 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Bootstrap error with |Bootstrap error with
|--enable-fixed-point |--enable-fixed-point
| |(configure should reject
| |--enable-fixed-point on
| |platforms that don't
| |support it)
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> > fixed point support is only currently supported for the MIPS target.
>
> So could the configure script error out earlier, then, if it is passed
> --enable-fixed-point for a target other than MIPS?
I'm going to re-title and self-assign on that basis.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point (configure should reject --enable-fixed-point on platforms that don't support it)
[not found] <bug-34422-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-24 15:07 ` [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point (configure should reject --enable-fixed-point on platforms that don't support it) egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-24 15:19 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-25 1:57 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-24 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point (configure should reject --enable-fixed-point on platforms that don't support it)
[not found] <bug-34422-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-24 15:19 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-25 1:57 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-25 2:15 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-25 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2008-01-22 00:58:46 |2022-5-24
CC| |Chao-Ying.Fu at imgtec dot com,
| |schwab at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #8)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6)
> > So could the configure script error out earlier, then, if it is passed
> > --enable-fixed-point for a target other than MIPS?
>
> I'm going to re-title and self-assign on that basis.
...ok, so wait, looking at gcc/configure.ac, it looks like there's already code
to ignore --enable-fixed-point for unsupported targets? (current list of
supported targets is arm, mips, and loongarch, for reference)
Furthermore, it looks like that code has been there since Chao-ying Fu first
added the flag in r0-82714-gab22c1fa94acc0... so why didn't it work and result
in the flag being properly ignored? I just checked again and the error still
occurs; now it reads:
/Users/ericgallager/gcc_newgit/abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz_01234567890.build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/Users/ericgallager/gcc_newgit/abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz_01234567890.build/./gcc/
-B/usr/local/x86_64-apple-darwin20/bin/ -B/usr/local/x86_64-apple-darwin20/lib/
-isystem /usr/local/x86_64-apple-darwin20/include -isystem
/usr/local/x86_64-apple-darwin20/sys-include -g -O2 -g -Os -O2 -g -O2 -g
-Os -DIN_GCC -fPIC -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wold-style-definition -isystem
./include -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 -fno-common -g -DIN_LIBGCC2
-fbuilding-libgcc -fno-stack-protector -mmacosx-version-min=10.4 -fno-common
-I. -I. -I../.././gcc -I../../../libgcc -I../../../libgcc/.
-I../../../libgcc/../gcc -I../../../libgcc/../include -DHAVE_CC_TLS
-DUSE_EMUTLS -o _addQQ_s.o -MT _addQQ_s.o -MD -MP -MF _addQQ_s.dep -DSHARED
-DL_add -DQQ_MODE -c ../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.c
In file included from ../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.c:55:
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:64:1: error: unable to emulate 'QQ'
64 | typedef _Fract QQtype __attribute__ ((mode (QQ)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:65:1: error: unable to emulate 'UQQ'
65 | typedef unsigned _Fract UQQtype __attribute__ ((mode (UQQ)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:66:1: error: unable to emulate 'HQ'
66 | typedef _Fract HQtype __attribute__ ((mode (HQ)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:67:1: error: unable to emulate 'UHQ'
67 | typedef unsigned _Fract UHQtype __attribute__ ((mode (UHQ)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:68:1: error: unable to emulate 'HA'
68 | typedef _Fract HAtype __attribute__ ((mode (HA)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:69:1: error: unable to emulate 'UHA'
69 | typedef unsigned _Fract UHAtype __attribute__ ((mode (UHA)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:84:1: error: unable to emulate 'SQ'
84 | typedef _Fract SQtype __attribute__ ((mode (SQ)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:85:1: error: unable to emulate 'USQ'
85 | typedef unsigned _Fract USQtype __attribute__ ((mode (USQ)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:86:1: error: unable to emulate 'SA'
86 | typedef _Fract SAtype __attribute__ ((mode (SA)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:87:1: error: unable to emulate 'USA'
87 | typedef unsigned _Fract USAtype __attribute__ ((mode (USA)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:98:1: error: unable to emulate 'DQ'
98 | typedef _Fract DQtype __attribute__ ((mode (DQ)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:99:1: error: unable to emulate 'UDQ'
99 | typedef unsigned _Fract UDQtype __attribute__ ((mode (UDQ)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:100:1: error: unable to emulate 'DA'
100 | typedef _Fract DAtype __attribute__ ((mode (DA)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:101:1: error: unable to emulate 'UDA'
101 | typedef unsigned _Fract UDAtype __attribute__ ((mode (UDA)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:112:1: error: unable to emulate 'TQ'
112 | typedef _Fract TQtype __attribute__ ((mode (TQ)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:113:1: error: unable to emulate 'UTQ'
113 | typedef unsigned _Fract UTQtype __attribute__ ((mode (UTQ)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:114:1: error: unable to emulate 'TA'
114 | typedef _Fract TAtype __attribute__ ((mode (TA)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.h:115:1: error: unable to emulate 'UTA'
115 | typedef unsigned _Fract UTAtype __attribute__ ((mode (UTA)));
| ^~~~~~~
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.c: In function '__addqq3':
../../../libgcc/fixed-bit.c:60:1: internal compiler error: in
classify_argument, at config/i386/i386.cc:2494
60 | {
| ^
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
-freport-bug).
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
make[1]: *** [_addQQ_s.o] Error 1
make: *** [all-target-libgcc] Error 2
cc-ing people who touched the code in gcc/configure.ac that ought to cause the
flag to be ignored most recently, according to git blame.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point (configure should reject --enable-fixed-point on platforms that don't support it)
[not found] <bug-34422-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-25 1:57 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-25 2:15 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-14 19:52 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-25 2:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
--- Comment #10 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Current code is like this:
# Enable C extension for fixed-point arithmetic.
AC_ARG_ENABLE(fixed-point,
[AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-fixed-point],
[enable fixed-point arithmetic extension to C])],
[],
[
case $target in
arm*)
enable_fixed_point=yes
;;
mips*-*-*)
enable_fixed_point=yes
;;
loongarch*-*-*)
enable_fixed_point=yes
;;
*)
AC_MSG_WARN([fixed-point is not supported for this target, ignored])
enable_fixed_point=no
;;
esac
])
AC_SUBST(enable_fixed_point)
Let's check the documentation for AC_ARG_ENABLE:
https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.71/html_node/Package-Options.html
So, argument 3 is used if the flag is given, and argument 4 is used when the
flag is *not* given... so when it says "ignored" in the warning, there's
nothing being ignored, because the flag wasn't actually given... perhaps the
3rd and 4th arguments just need to be swapped?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point (configure should reject --enable-fixed-point on platforms that don't support it)
[not found] <bug-34422-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-25 2:15 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-14 19:52 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-07-07 23:22 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-25 13:24 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-14 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |patch
URL| |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
| |il/gcc-patches/2022-June/59
| |6654.html
--- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Patch posted to gcc-patches:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-June/596654.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point (configure should reject --enable-fixed-point on platforms that don't support it)
[not found] <bug-34422-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-14 19:52 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-07-07 23:22 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-08-25 13:24 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-07-07 23:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #11)
> Patch posted to gcc-patches:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-June/596654.html
So this patch needs some more work; it might take awhile before I get to fixing
it though... should I unassign? I still intend to get back to this later, but I
just want to make sure that people are clear that they can give it a try
themselves in the meantime...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point (configure should reject --enable-fixed-point on platforms that don't support it)
[not found] <bug-34422-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-07-07 23:22 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-08-25 13:24 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-08-25 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
Assignee|egallager at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #12)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #11)
> > Patch posted to gcc-patches:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-June/596654.html
>
> So this patch needs some more work; it might take awhile before I get to
> fixing it though... should I unassign? I still intend to get back to this
> later, but I just want to make sure that people are clear that they can give
> it a try themselves in the meantime...
...ok yeah I think I'm going to unassign; if anyone thinks they can address the
feedback from here, feel free to take it:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-June/597046.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point
2007-12-10 17:56 [Bug c/34422] New: Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz
@ 2008-01-22 3:12 ` bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-11 9:33 ` tom_t at gmx dot at
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: bje at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-01-22 3:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-22 00:58 -------
Confirmed with today' r131705. The --with-arch option seems to have no
involvement here.
--
bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-01-22 00:58:46
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point
2007-12-10 17:56 [Bug c/34422] New: Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz
2008-01-22 3:12 ` [Bug target/34422] " bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-03-11 9:33 ` tom_t at gmx dot at
2008-10-17 21:09 ` bernard at brenda-arkle dot me dot uk
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: tom_t at gmx dot at @ 2008-03-11 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from tom_t at gmx dot at 2008-03-11 09:32 -------
Hello
I got the same problems using the 4.3.0 release as well as with the current 4.4
snapshot (20080307).
Is there any workaround? Or any version where --enable-fixed-point actually
works? I tried 4.2.3, which compiled fine, but the resulting compiler doesn't
support the extensions...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point
2007-12-10 17:56 [Bug c/34422] New: Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz
2008-01-22 3:12 ` [Bug target/34422] " bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-11 9:33 ` tom_t at gmx dot at
@ 2008-10-17 21:09 ` bernard at brenda-arkle dot me dot uk
2009-01-06 14:55 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
2009-01-06 18:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: bernard at brenda-arkle dot me dot uk @ 2008-10-17 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from bernard at brenda-arkle dot me dot uk 2008-10-17 21:08 -------
I've seen this with 4.3.1 and 4.3.2 official releases with (as it happens)
athlon-64 again (but 32-bit Linux). But then I also saw it with 4.3.1
on a pure Pentium4 system, so I don't think it's really 64-bit specific.
I've *never* built successfully with --enable-fixed-point .
--
bernard at brenda-arkle dot me dot uk changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bernard at brenda-arkle dot
| |me dot uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point
2007-12-10 17:56 [Bug c/34422] New: Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-10-17 21:09 ` bernard at brenda-arkle dot me dot uk
@ 2009-01-06 14:55 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
2009-01-06 18:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: rob1weld at aol dot com @ 2009-01-06 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2009-01-06 14:55 -------
Confirmed on i386-pc-solaris2.11, building gcc version 4.4.0 20090106.
In addition I get an ice-on-valid-code .
# gmake profiledbootstrap
...
/usr/share/src/gcc_build/./gcc/xgcc -B/usr/share/src/gcc_build/./gcc/
-B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.11/bin/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.11/lib/
-isystem /usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.11/include -isystem
/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.11/sys-include -g -O2 -m64 -O2 -g -O2 -DIN_GCC
-W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual
-Wold-style-definition -isystem ./include -fPIC -g -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT
-DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -I. -I. -I../../.././gcc
-I../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc -I../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/.
-I../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc -I../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../include
-I../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../libdecnumber/dpd
-I../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../libdecnumber -DHAVE_CC_TLS -o _addQQ.o -MT
_addQQ.o -MD -MP -MF _addQQ.dep -DL_add -DQQ_MODE -c
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.c -fvisibility=hidden
-DHIDE_EXPORTS
In file included from
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.c:59:
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:79: error: unable to
emulate 'QQ'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:80: error: unable to
emulate 'UQQ'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:81: error: unable to
emulate 'HQ'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:82: error: unable to
emulate 'UHQ'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:83: error: unable to
emulate 'HA'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:84: error: unable to
emulate 'UHA'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:99: error: unable to
emulate 'SQ'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:100: error: unable to
emulate 'USQ'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:101: error: unable to
emulate 'SA'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:102: error: unable to
emulate 'USA'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:113: error: unable to
emulate 'DQ'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:114: error: unable to
emulate 'UDQ'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:115: error: unable to
emulate 'DA'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:116: error: unable to
emulate 'UDA'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:127: error: unable to
emulate 'TQ'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:128: error: unable to
emulate 'UTQ'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:129: error: unable to
emulate 'TA'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.h:130: error: unable to
emulate 'UTA'
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.c: In function '__addqq3':
../../../../gcc_trunk/libgcc/../gcc/config/fixed-bit.c:64: internal compiler
error: in classify_argument, at config/i386/i386.c:5123
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
gmake[5]: *** [_addQQ.o] Error 1
gmake[5]: Leaving directory
`/usr/share/src/gcc_build/i386-pc-solaris2.11/amd64/libgcc'
gmake[4]: *** [multi-do] Error 1
gmake[4]: Leaving directory
`/usr/share/src/gcc_build/i386-pc-solaris2.11/libgcc'
gmake[3]: *** [all-multi] Error 2
gmake[3]: Leaving directory
`/usr/share/src/gcc_build/i386-pc-solaris2.11/libgcc'
gmake[2]: *** [all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2
gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/share/src/gcc_build'
gmake[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2
gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/share/src/gcc_build'
gmake: *** [profiledbootstrap] Error 2
Rob
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug target/34422] Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point
2007-12-10 17:56 [Bug c/34422] New: Bootstrap error with --enable-fixed-point drab at kepler dot fjfi dot cvut dot cz
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-06 14:55 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
@ 2009-01-06 18:46 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
4 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-06 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-06 18:46 -------
fixed point support is only currently supported for the MIPS target.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34422
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread