From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19670 invoked by alias); 30 Jun 2011 13:41:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 19658 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jun 2011 13:41:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,TW_GJ X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:41:02 +0000 From: "gjl at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/34734] attribute((progmem)) not handled properly in C++ for AVRs X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.2 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Keywords Status CC Known to work Resolution Target Milestone Known to fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:41:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg02979.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34734 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |diagnostic Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |gjl at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work| |4.6.2 Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2 Known to fail| |4.6.1 --- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-06-30 13:39:18 UTC --- Closed as resolved+fixed. (In reply to comment #5) > same problem in 4.5.2. > Maybe importance of this bug should be increased? Imho it's a little bit > embarrassing to keep this bug so long... (since 2008, over 3 yrs!) > regards Increasing importance won't help. The only thing that would help is increasing number of people that are inclined to improve avr-gcc. regards Note that progmem on types is not documented an not supposed to work at all.