From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id E7EBC3858414; Tue,  7 Dec 2021 02:22:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E7EBC3858414
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/34810] accepts invalid dependent(?) type in template class
 method
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 02:22:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-34810-4-rFu7vX2T0B@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-34810-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-34810-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 02:22:07 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D34810

--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Oh this:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#318

In a lookup in which the constructor is an acceptable lookup result, if the
nested-name-specifier nominates a class C and the name specified after the
nested-name-specifier, when looked up in C, is the injected class name of C
(clause Clause 11 [class]), the name is instead considered to name the
constructor of class C. [Note: For example, the constructor is not an
acceptable lookup result in an elaborated type specifier so the constructor
would not be used in place of the injected class name.]


So the question becomes is typename is enough here.=