From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id A32563851C27; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 02:06:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org A32563851C27 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1595815588; bh=3rmlLBOKv85GyoYgy0npFRwdyW+B1fASLtu0j6ySpsM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=emZY3SH2x7NUb/6m4V9NH1+DGwTkYTThfH6jY0rAdt1+tM2mXUswm81lUdNIA76xP da/MrMeh3aOdQAJULFnhv3tbOJOkNt25PoG+CIWdO+KlUvOMIzR5mb2pGtt3Q4VK7m dK0gmTHGT4tHYdV/vy6XXZf67m8f2heBwi3/imfY= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/3506] weird behaviour when incrementing volatile ints Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 02:06:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 02:06:28 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3506 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paulmckrcu at gmail dot com --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 96327 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***=