From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 3C330385B522; Thu,  9 Feb 2023 18:11:57 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3C330385B522
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1675966317;
	bh=leeZr2KNh+IwbmRK5f13PcRJ8FUtaWr6ZUL9VKW/HN8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=yLB1q1Z3ozXw+x/T2F5/7nY9fO8Xv08tlVxBhNGv5jSMhvAvjRhsG1psvrkA4pNKs
	 s91KOynUaz53N+7cs7IC61nFDJV71zOTWo4Bu31+hT16qToqMY+OBRuiZgQmWXbb2B
	 HdWRfjBDKh8bgW2q6htnnJsexrAuSrGwaUBLKHQw=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/3506] volatile forces load into register
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2023 18:11:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution short_desc bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-3506-4-txiAZKsFry@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-3506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-3506-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3506

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|INVALID                     |---
            Summary|weird behaviour when        |volatile forces load into
                   |incrementing volatile ints  |register
             Status|RESOLVED                    |NEW

--- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reopening ...=