public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/35082] 841 unexpected failures in gfortran testsuite with GMP 2.0n ABI
[not found] <bug-35082-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-02-01 20:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-01 20:40 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-01 20:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35082
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-01 20:20:31 UTC ---
Do you know if these work after the fixes you did recently?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/35082] 841 unexpected failures in gfortran testsuite with GMP 2.0n ABI
[not found] <bug-35082-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-01 20:21 ` [Bug middle-end/35082] 841 unexpected failures in gfortran testsuite with GMP 2.0n ABI pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-01 20:40 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dave.anglin at bell dot net @ 2012-02-01 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35082
--- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-02-01 20:40:07 UTC ---
On 2/1/2012 3:20 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Do you know if these work after the fixes you did recently?
Unlikely, however, I should recheck the report and try to find the problem.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/35082] 841 unexpected failures in gfortran testsuite with GMP 2.0n ABI
2008-02-05 0:54 [Bug c/35082] New: [Regression 4.2] 841 unexpected failures in gfortran testsuite danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-06 18:10 ` [Bug middle-end/35082] 841 unexpected failures in gfortran testsuite with GMP 2.0n ABI danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-19 20:33 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-07-04 19:53 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-04 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-04 19:52 -------
Regression marker was removed, removing milestone.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.5 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/35082] 841 unexpected failures in gfortran testsuite with GMP 2.0n ABI
2008-02-05 0:54 [Bug c/35082] New: [Regression 4.2] 841 unexpected failures in gfortran testsuite danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-06 18:10 ` [Bug middle-end/35082] 841 unexpected failures in gfortran testsuite with GMP 2.0n ABI danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-05-19 20:33 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 19:53 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-05-19 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-19 20:24 -------
4.2.4 is being released, changing milestones to 4.2.5.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.2.4 |4.2.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/35082] 841 unexpected failures in gfortran testsuite with GMP 2.0n ABI
2008-02-05 0:54 [Bug c/35082] New: [Regression 4.2] 841 unexpected failures in gfortran testsuite danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-02-06 18:10 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-19 20:33 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 19:53 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-02-06 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-06 18:10 -------
It turns out these failures are a result of using the 2.0n ABI
with gmp-4.2.2. This is the default for hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11.
In all my previous testing, I had built GMP using the standard
1.x ABI. Using the 2.0n ABI affects libmpfr.
The 2.0n ABI attempts to exploit the 64-bit registers and
instructions present in PA-RISC 2.0 when using the 32-bit HP-UX
runtime. This is possible because wide HP-UX kernels maintain
a full 64-bit context for 32-bit applications.
I expect this problem affects all GCC versions requiring GMP for
this target.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC|rth at gcc dot gnu dot org |
Summary|[4.2 Regression] 841 |841 unexpected failures in
|unexpected failures in |gfortran testsuite with GMP
|gfortran testsuite |2.0n ABI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-01 20:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-35082-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-02-01 20:21 ` [Bug middle-end/35082] 841 unexpected failures in gfortran testsuite with GMP 2.0n ABI pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-01 20:40 ` dave.anglin at bell dot net
2008-02-05 0:54 [Bug c/35082] New: [Regression 4.2] 841 unexpected failures in gfortran testsuite danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-02-06 18:10 ` [Bug middle-end/35082] 841 unexpected failures in gfortran testsuite with GMP 2.0n ABI danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-05-19 20:33 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-07-04 19:53 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).