From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-381672-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10481 invoked by alias); 28 Jan 2012 22:33:09 -0000
Received: (qmail 10430 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Jan 2012 22:33:07 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:32:54 +0000
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/35476] Accepts invalid: USE/host association of generics with same specifics
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:09:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-35476-4-wqLnMeROHJ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-35476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-35476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg03347.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D35476

Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-28 22=
:32:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Any progress three years later?

Yes, F2008 got released and has a slightly different wording. In F2003:

"This subclause contains the rules that shall be satisfied by every pair of
specific procedures that have the same generic identifier within a scoping
unit."

while F2008 has:

"This subclause contains the rules that shall be satis=0Ced by every pair of
specific procedures that have the same generic identi=0Cer within the scope=
 of
the identifier."

See also http://j3-fortran.org/doc/year/11/11-219r1.txt