public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc
       [not found] <bug-35531-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2010-12-07 20:07 ` gseanmcg at gmail dot com
  2010-12-09  1:41 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: gseanmcg at gmail dot com @ 2010-12-07 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531

Sean McGovern <gseanmcg at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |gseanmcg at gmail dot com

--- Comment #13 from Sean McGovern <gseanmcg at gmail dot com> 2010-12-07 20:06:27 UTC ---
Since I have had successful builds of both 4.5.x and 4.6.x of gcc using current
GNU binutils (2.20.1.x) and Sun ld, can this bug be closed?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc
       [not found] <bug-35531-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2010-12-07 20:07 ` [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc gseanmcg at gmail dot com
@ 2010-12-09  1:41 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us @ 2010-12-09  1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531

bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #14 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us 2010-12-09 01:41:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Since I have had successful builds of both 4.5.x and 4.6.x of gcc using current
> GNU binutils (2.20.1.x) and Sun ld, can this bug be closed?

Yes, this bug can be closed.  I am using GCC 4.4.4 with GNU as and the Sun ld
with no problems:

% gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-pc-solaris2.10
Configured with: /home/bfriesen/src/gnu/gcc-4.4.4/configure
LDFLAGS='-L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib' --program-suffix=-4.4.4
--enable-shared --enable-threads --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs
--with-gnu-as --with-as=/usr/local/lib/binutils-2.20/bin/as --without-gnu-ld
--with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --with-gmp=/usr/local --with-mpfr=/usr/local
--with-cpu=opteron --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.4 (GCC)

Bob


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc
  2008-03-10 21:18 [Bug bootstrap/35531] New: " bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-07-01 11:58 ` marek dot rouchal at infineon dot com
@ 2009-07-01 16:42 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us @ 2009-07-01 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #12 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us  2009-07-01 16:42 -------
It seems that bugs gradually get fixed.  I am successfully using GCC 4.3.3 on
the same system configure like:

/home/bfriesen/src/gnu/gcc-4.3.3/configure LDFLAGS='-L/usr/local/lib
-R/usr/local/lib' --program-suffix=-4.3.3 --enable-shared --enable-threads
--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --with-gnu-as
--with-as=/usr/local/lib/binutils-2.19/bin/as --without-gnu-ld
--with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --with-cpu=opteron --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran

Notice that I am using 'as' from a recent binutils release rather than the one
which comes with Solaris.

Unfortunately, GCC 4.4.0 is not so luckly since it once again does not work
with Solaris ld.  If GCC does not work with Solaris ld, then I can't use it.

Bob


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc
  2008-03-10 21:18 [Bug bootstrap/35531] New: " bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-07-19 21:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-07-01 11:58 ` marek dot rouchal at infineon dot com
  2009-07-01 16:42 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: marek dot rouchal at infineon dot com @ 2009-07-01 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #11 from marek dot rouchal at infineon dot com  2009-07-01 11:58 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> and did get farther, but the final link fails like
> ...
> ld: fatal: unwind table: file
> /home/bfriesen/build/gcc-4.3.0/./gcc/amd64/crtend.o: section .eh_frame: bad cie
> version 0: offset 0xfffffd7fffdfb220

I saw this, too with gcc-4.3.2 on Solaris 10 x86. The issue is described also
in Bug 33100, which seems to be fixed in gcc-4.3.3. Furthermore, the linker
error is supposed to be fixed with a Sun/Solaris patch: 139574-03 for SPARC and
139575-03 for x86 (quoted from Bug 33100).

-Marek


-- 

marek dot rouchal at infineon dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |marek dot rouchal at
                   |                            |infineon dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc
  2008-03-10 21:18 [Bug bootstrap/35531] New: " bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-03-11 16:36 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
@ 2008-07-19 21:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-07-01 11:58 ` marek dot rouchal at infineon dot com
  2009-07-01 16:42 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-07-19 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-07-19 21:32 -------
*** Bug 36878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |flipper_drill at yahoo dot
                   |                            |com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc
  2008-03-10 21:18 [Bug bootstrap/35531] New: " bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-03-11 16:20 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2008-03-11 16:36 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
  2008-07-19 21:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us @ 2008-03-11 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us  2008-03-11 16:35 -------
A documentation update will be suffient provided that binutils 'ld' adequately
supports Solaris now.  However, I notice that there are may be some issues with
code built/linked with the Sun linker and the binutils linker.  In particular,
a static-linked Perl interpreter fails to dynamically load its own modules if
it is built using 4.3.0, but works with 4.2.1 (which uses Sun linker).  I am
not sure why this is yet. Perhaps the needed symbols are not entirely resolved.

I will be doing more testing today.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc
  2008-03-10 21:18 [Bug bootstrap/35531] New: " bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-03-11 15:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-03-11 16:20 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  2008-03-11 16:36 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2008-03-11 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2008-03-11 16:20 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#ix86-x-solaris210
> 
> It is recommended that you configure GCC to use the GNU assembler in
> /usr/sfw/bin/gas but the Sun linker, using the options --with-gnu-as
> --with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas --without-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld.

It looks that the documentation needs to be updated.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc
  2008-03-10 21:18 [Bug bootstrap/35531] New: " bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-03-11 15:51 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
@ 2008-03-11 15:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-03-11 16:20 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-11 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-03-11 15:53 -------
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#ix86-x-solaris210

It is recommended that you configure GCC to use the GNU assembler in
/usr/sfw/bin/gas but the Sun linker, using the options --with-gnu-as
--with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas --without-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc
  2008-03-10 21:18 [Bug bootstrap/35531] New: " bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-03-11 11:17 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2008-03-11 15:51 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
  2008-03-11 15:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us @ 2008-03-11 15:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us  2008-03-11 15:51 -------
The previous GCC releases worked "out of the box" but 4.3.0 does not.  Give
this, how can this bug report be "invalid"?  The configuration for Solaris 10
on x86 hardware has clearly degraded as compared to former releases.


-- 

bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc
  2008-03-10 21:18 [Bug bootstrap/35531] New: " bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-03-10 23:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-03-11 11:17 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
  2008-03-11 15:51 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2008-03-11 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2008-03-11 11:17 -------
Any way, it is not gcc that fails here.


-- 

ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc
  2008-03-10 21:18 [Bug bootstrap/35531] New: " bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-03-10 23:06 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
@ 2008-03-10 23:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-03-11 11:17 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-10 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-03-10 23:20 -------
I always hear the opposite way around, that is the Sun's assembler and linker
are not that good.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc
  2008-03-10 21:18 [Bug bootstrap/35531] New: " bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
  2008-03-10 21:23 ` [Bug bootstrap/35531] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-03-10 21:50 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
@ 2008-03-10 23:06 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
  2008-03-10 23:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us @ 2008-03-10 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us  2008-03-10 23:05 -------
By using 'as' and 'ld' from binutils-2.18, I have achieved a successful
compile.  Using gas and the system linker was not sufficient since it resulted
in the same error.  Based on past experience, I don't have a lot of faith in
GNU ld under Solaris.  Has it substantially improved?

The final configuration incantation is:
/home/bfriesen/src/gnu/gcc-4.3.0/configure --program-suffix=-4.3.0
--enable-shared --enable-threads --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs
--with-gnu-as --with-as=/usr/local/lib/binutils-2.18/bin/as
--with-ld=/usr/local/lib/binutils-2.18/bin/ld --enable-languages=c,c++


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc
  2008-03-10 21:18 [Bug bootstrap/35531] New: " bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
  2008-03-10 21:23 ` [Bug bootstrap/35531] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-03-10 21:50 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
  2008-03-10 23:06 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us @ 2008-03-10 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us  2008-03-10 21:49 -------
It seems (according to gcc -v) that GCC 4.2.1 re-configured itself to use:

/scratch/bfriesen/build/gcc-4.2.1/configure --program-suffix=-4.2.1
--enable-shared --enable-threads --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs
--disable-nls --with-gnu-as --with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas --without-gnu-ld
--with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --with-cpu=opteron --enable-languages=c,c++

so I just tried configuring with

/home/bfriesen/src/gnu/gcc-4.3.0/configure --program-suffix=-4.3.0
--enable-shared --enable-threads --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs
--with-gnu-as --with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas --without-gnu-ld
--with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --with-cpu=opteron --enable-languages=c,c++

and did get farther, but the final link fails like

/bin/bash /home/bfriesen/src/gnu/gcc-4.3.0/libgcc/../mkinstalldirs amd64
mkdir amd64
/home/bfriesen/build/gcc-4.3.0/./gcc/xgcc
-B/home/bfriesen/build/gcc-4.3.0/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/bin/
-B/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/lib/ -isystem
/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/include -isystem
/usr/local/i386-pc-solaris2.10/sys-include -O2  -O2 -g -O2   -DIN_GCC    -W
-Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wold-style-definition  -isystem ./include  -fPIC -g -DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT
-DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED  -shared -nodefaultlibs
-Wl,-h,libgcc_s.so.1 -Wl,-z,text -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-M,libgcc.map -o
amd64/libgcc_s.so.1.tmp -g -fkeep-inline-functions -m64 -B./ _muldi3_s.o
_negdi2_s.o _lshrdi3_s.o _ashldi3_s.o _ashrdi3_s.o _cmpdi2_s.o _ucmpdi2_s.o
_clear_cache_s.o _enable_execute_stack_s.o _trampoline_s.o __main_s.o
_absvsi2_s.o _absvdi2_s.o _addvsi3_s.o _addvdi3_s.o _subvsi3_s.o _subvdi3_s.o
_mulvsi3_s.o _mulvdi3_s.o _negvsi2_s.o _negvdi2_s.o _ctors_s.o _ffssi2_s.o
_ffsdi2_s.o _clz_s.o _clzsi2_s.o _clzdi2_s.o _ctzsi2_s.o _ctzdi2_s.o
_popcount_tab_s.o _popcountsi2_s.o _popcountdi2_s.o _paritysi2_s.o
_paritydi2_s.o _powisf2_s.o _powidf2_s.o _powixf2_s.o _powitf2_s.o _mulsc3_s.o
_muldc3_s.o _mulxc3_s.o _multc3_s.o _divsc3_s.o _divdc3_s.o _divxc3_s.o
_divtc3_s.o _bswapsi2_s.o _bswapdi2_s.o _fixunssfsi_s.o _fixunsdfsi_s.o
_fixunsxfsi_s.o _fixsfdi_s.o _fixdfdi_s.o _fixxfdi_s.o _fixtfdi_s.o
_fixunssfdi_s.o _fixunsdfdi_s.o _fixunsxfdi_s.o _fixunstfdi_s.o _floatdisf_s.o
_floatdidf_s.o _floatdixf_s.o _floatditf_s.o _floatundisf_s.o _floatundidf_s.o
_floatundixf_s.o _floatunditf_s.o _divdi3_s.o _moddi3_s.o _udivdi3_s.o
_umoddi3_s.o _udiv_w_sdiv_s.o _udivmoddi4_s.o unwind-dw2_s.o unwind-dw2-fde_s.o
unwind-sjlj_s.o gthr-gnat_s.o unwind-c_s.o emutls_s.o -lc && rm -f
amd64/libgcc_s.so && if [ -f amd64/libgcc_s.so.1 ]; then mv -f
amd64/libgcc_s.so.1 amd64/libgcc_s.so.1.backup; else true; fi && mv
amd64/libgcc_s.so.1.tmp amd64/libgcc_s.so.1 && ln -s libgcc_s.so.1
amd64/libgcc_s.so
ld: fatal: unwind table: file
/home/bfriesen/build/gcc-4.3.0/./gcc/amd64/crtend.o: section .eh_frame: bad cie
version 0: offset 0xfffffd7fffdfb220


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc
  2008-03-10 21:18 [Bug bootstrap/35531] New: " bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
@ 2008-03-10 21:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-03-10 21:50 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-10 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-03-10 21:22 -------
I think even Sun recommends you use the GNU Assembler for x86_64 Solaris.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|blocker                     |normal


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35531


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-09  1:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-35531-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-12-07 20:07 ` [Bug bootstrap/35531] Assembler failure while compiling libgcc gseanmcg at gmail dot com
2010-12-09  1:41 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas.tx.us
2008-03-10 21:18 [Bug bootstrap/35531] New: " bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
2008-03-10 21:23 ` [Bug bootstrap/35531] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-10 21:50 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
2008-03-10 23:06 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
2008-03-10 23:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-11 11:17 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-03-11 15:51 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
2008-03-11 15:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-11 16:20 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2008-03-11 16:36 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us
2008-07-19 21:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-07-01 11:58 ` marek dot rouchal at infineon dot com
2009-07-01 16:42 ` bfriesen at simple dot dallas dot tx dot us

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).