* [Bug other/35618] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
@ 2008-03-17 19:12 ` bunk at stusta dot de
2008-03-17 19:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bunk at stusta dot de @ 2008-03-17 19:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from bunk at stusta dot de 2008-03-17 19:11 -------
Created an attachment (id=15337)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15337&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug other/35618] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
2008-03-17 19:12 ` [Bug other/35618] " bunk at stusta dot de
@ 2008-03-17 19:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-17 19:23 ` bunk at stusta dot de
` (12 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-17 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-17 19:14 -------
First -fno-unit-at-a-time seems wrong.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug other/35618] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
2008-03-17 19:12 ` [Bug other/35618] " bunk at stusta dot de
2008-03-17 19:14 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-03-17 19:23 ` bunk at stusta dot de
2008-03-18 10:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bunk at stusta dot de @ 2008-03-17 19:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from bunk at stusta dot de 2008-03-17 19:23 -------
That's the UML kernel, and it was added there quite some time ago.
I do not know whether that might be dropped or whether it might still result in
increased stack usage with gcc 4.3, but IMHO as long as gcc offers this option
it shouldn't cause an ICE.
--
bunk at stusta dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug other/35618] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-17 19:23 ` bunk at stusta dot de
@ 2008-03-18 10:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-03-25 18:59 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-03-18 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug other/35618] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-18 10:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-03-25 18:59 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2008-03-25 19:25 ` bunk at stusta dot de
` (9 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2008-03-25 18:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2008-03-25 18:58 -------
I can't reproduce this with
tmp/g> /home/bangerth/bin/x86/gcc-mainline/bin/gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../mainline/configure
--prefix=/home/bangerth/bin/x86/gcc-mainline --enable-languages=c,c++
--enable-checking --with-gmp=/home/bangerth/bin/x86
--with-mpfr=/home/bangerth/bin/x86
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.4.0 20080317 (experimental) [trunk revision 133287] (GCC)
Can you state which flags you actually need to reproduce the bug with
your preprocessed sources?
W.
--
bangerth at dealii dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bangerth at dealii dot org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug other/35618] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-25 18:59 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2008-03-25 19:25 ` bunk at stusta dot de
2008-03-25 19:37 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bunk at stusta dot de @ 2008-03-25 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from bunk at stusta dot de 2008-03-25 19:24 -------
The flags I used are in my bug description.
It seems "-Os -fno-unit-at-a-time" are the minimum flags required for
reproducing it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug other/35618] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-25 19:25 ` bunk at stusta dot de
@ 2008-03-25 19:37 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2008-03-26 13:55 ` [Bug other/35618] [4.3 " bunk at stusta dot de
` (7 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bangerth at dealii dot org @ 2008-03-25 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from bangerth at dealii dot org 2008-03-25 19:37 -------
It appears to work with "gcc version 4.4.0 20080317". Can you see if it
works for you as well with a more recent gcc version (either from top-of-tree
or the top of the 4.3 branch that you used in your experiments)?
W.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug other/35618] [4.3 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-25 19:37 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
@ 2008-03-26 13:55 ` bunk at stusta dot de
2008-05-23 14:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/35618] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: bunk at stusta dot de @ 2008-03-26 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from bunk at stusta dot de 2008-03-26 13:54 -------
Bug seems to be no longer present with svn HEAD.
Bug is still present in 4.3 as of 4.3-20080320.
--
bunk at stusta dot de changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Summary|[4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in |[4.3 regression] ICE in
|cgraph_estimate_size_after_i|cgraph_estimate_size_after_i
|nlining, at ipa-inline.c:188|nlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/35618] [4.3 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-26 13:55 ` [Bug other/35618] [4.3 " bunk at stusta dot de
@ 2008-05-23 14:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-06-06 15:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-05-23 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-23 14:35 -------
Confirmed.
Testcase, -Os -fno-unit-at-a-time
static void __resched_task(void *p, int tif_bit);
static inline __attribute__((always_inline))
void resched_task(void *p) { __resched_task(p, 2); }
static void __resched_task(void *p, int tif_bit) { }
void check_preempt_curr_idle(void *p)
{
resched_task(p);
}
if you put an inline onto the definition of __resched_task the testcase
also ICEs for -O and -O2, so quite likely we are more agressive with -Os
inlining but decide so after-the-fact which confuses the size estimates.
Honza, can you please have a look here?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|other |tree-optimization
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
GCC build triplet|i486-linux-gnu |
GCC host triplet|i486-linux-gnu |
GCC target triplet|i486-linux-gnu |
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-05-23 14:35:53
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/35618] [4.3 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-23 14:36 ` [Bug tree-optimization/35618] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-06-06 15:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-08-27 22:08 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-06-06 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-06-06 14:59 -------
4.3.1 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.1 |4.3.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/35618] [4.3 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2008-06-06 15:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-08-27 22:08 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-24 10:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-08-27 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-27 22:03 -------
4.3.2 is released, changing milestones to 4.3.3.
--
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.2 |4.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/35618] [4.3 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2008-08-27 22:08 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-24 10:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-08-04 12:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-24 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 10:20 -------
GCC 4.3.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.3 |4.3.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/35618] [4.3 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-24 10:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-08-04 12:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-05-22 18:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-12 13:39 ` kamaraju at gmail dot com
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-08-04 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 12:28 -------
GCC 4.3.4 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.4 |4.3.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/35618] [4.3 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-08-04 12:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-05-22 18:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-09-12 13:39 ` kamaraju at gmail dot com
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-05-22 18:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-05-22 18:12 -------
GCC 4.3.5 is being released, adjusting target milestone.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.5 |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/35618] [4.3 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188
2008-03-17 19:11 [Bug other/35618] New: [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:188 bunk at stusta dot de
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-22 18:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-09-12 13:39 ` kamaraju at gmail dot com
14 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: kamaraju at gmail dot com @ 2010-09-12 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from kamaraju at gmail dot com 2010-09-12 13:39 -------
The reduced test case in comment #8, with options "-c -Os -fno-unit-at-a-time",
does not ICE in gcc 4.4.5 20100909, gcc 4.6.0 20100828. But it gives an ICE
with gcc 4.3.5.
Also, for sched.i, with options "-c -Os -fno-unit-at-a-time", there is no ICE
with gcc 4.4.5 20100909, gcc 4.6.0 20100828. But it gives an ICE with gcc
4.3.5.
Just FYI.
--
kamaraju at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kamaraju at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35618
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread