[Bug tree-optimization/35716] New: [4.4 Regression]: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f and gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f

[Bug tree-optimization/35716] New: [4.4 Regression]: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f and gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f

[hjl dot tools at gmail dot com]

Gcc 4.4 revision 133635 has

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-03/msg02105.html

FAIL: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f  -O1  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f  -O2  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f  -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f  -Os  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f  -O1  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f  -O2  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f  -O3 -g  execution test
FAIL: gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f  -Os  execution test

Revision 133631 is OK

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-03/msg02101.html


-- 
           Summary: [4.4 Regression]: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f and
                    gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35716

[Bug tree-optimization/35716] [4.4 Regression]: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f and gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f

[bonzini at gnu dot org]

------- Comment #1 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2008-03-27 14:27 -------
my build patches are innocent :-)


-- 

bonzini at gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|bonzini at gnu dot org      |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35716

[Bug tree-optimization/35716] [4.4 Regression]: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f and gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f

[dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr]

------- Comment #2 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2008-03-27 14:41 -------
Confirmed on i686-apple-darwin9 at revision 133638. The error is:

Fortran runtime error: Assigned label is not in the list


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35716

[Bug tree-optimization/35716] [4.4 Regression]: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f and gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f

[hp at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-03-27 15:11 -------
Seen for cris-elf too; worked with 133631, failed with 133638.


-- 

hp at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2008-03-27 15:11:34
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35716

[Bug tree-optimization/35716] [4.4 Regression]: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f and gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f

[hjl dot tools at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2008-03-27 15:44 -------
I have verified that revision 133632:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-03/msg00852.html

is the cause.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35716

[Bug tree-optimization/35716] [4.4 Regression]: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f and gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-03-27 16:22 -------
Mine.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
   Last reconfirmed|2008-03-27 15:11:34         |2008-03-27 16:22:10
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35716

[Bug tree-optimization/35716] [4.4 Regression]: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f and gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-03-27 17:10 -------
Fixed.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35716

[Bug tree-optimization/35716] [4.4 Regression]: gfortran.dg/assign_6.f and gfortran.dg/g77/dnrm2.f

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-03-27 17:10 -------
Subject: Bug 35716

Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 27 17:09:54 2008
New Revision: 133647

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=133647
Log:
2008-03-27  Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>

        PR middle-end/35716
        * fold-const.c (fold_comparison): Restrict distinct decl
        comparison folding to VAR_DECLs and PARM_DECLs.  Do not
        solely rely on operand_equal_p.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/fold-const.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35716