From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8919 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2013 09:39:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6736 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jul 2013 09:37:45 -0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libfortran/35862] [F2003] Implement new rounding modes for run time Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:39:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00822.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D35862 --- Comment #26 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #24) > [Somehow printf doesn't like my long double/__float128 example and prints > 0.0 (long double) or garbage numbers (__float128).] You should use %25.22Lf instead of %25.22lf. >>From gcc-bugs-return-426316-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jul 17 10:07:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11274 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2013 10:07:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9156 invoked by uid 48); 17 Jul 2013 10:05:27 -0000 From: "nishant.031 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/57917] -Wuninitialized Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.2.4 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: nishant.031 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00823.txt.bz2 Content-length: 699 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57917 --- Comment #2 from Nishant Sharma --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > GCC 4.2 is ancient and no longer supported. > > This is not "critical", it's your code that has a bug, not the compiler. > > You don't use A::isABC in the program, so it's a poor testcase. > > There are lots of existing PRs about this, e.g. PR 2972 and PR 42000 and PR > 19808 > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 19808 *** Even if from main, if I execute: a.setABC(false); Then also it does NOT report a warning. This should have worked isn't it? My main intent is to ask how to catch such warnings?