From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-250361-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16867 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2008 14:52:35 -0000
Received: (qmail 16743 invoked by uid 48); 20 Apr 2008 14:51:54 -0000
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:52:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug c++/35986]  New: [4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] ICE with ambiguous template functions
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-35986-1771@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg01392.txt.bz2

The following invalid code snippet triggers an ICE since GCC 4.0.1:

================================
namespace
{
  template<int> void foo(...);
}

template<int> void foo(...);

void bar()
{
  foo<0>(0);
}
================================

bug.cc: In function 'void bar()':
bug.cc:10: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report, [etc.]

In GCC 4.0.0 and earlier we got a correct error message:
bug.cc: In function 'void bar()':
bug.cc:10: error: call of overloaded 'foo(int)' is ambiguous
bug.cc:6: note: candidates are: void foo(...) [with int <anonymous> = 0]
bug.cc:3: note:                 void<unnamed>::foo(...) [with int <anonymous> =
0]


-- 
           Summary: [4.1/4.2/4.3/4.4 regression] ICE with ambiguous template
                    functions
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code, monitored
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35986