public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/36107] New: weak constructor product unvalid asm
@ 2008-05-02 11:56 william dot fink at gmail dot com
2008-05-05 5:11 ` [Bug c++/36107] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: william dot fink at gmail dot com @ 2008-05-02 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
When using __attribute__((weak)) on a constructor, the produced assembly file
contains an extra *INTERNAL* on the constructor declaration line.
- Here is my test code:
class Test {
public:
Test() __attribute__((weak));
};
int test() {
Test test;
}
- The compilation output:
$ g++ test.cc
/tmp/cchKRpYD.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cchKRpYD.s:22: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is
`*'
- The corresponding asm line 22:
.weak _ZN4TestC1Ev *INTERNAL*
I have tried this with and it does not work for:
- gcc (GCC) 4.3.0 (compiled from sources)
- gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Ubuntu 4.2.1-5ubuntu4)
- gcc-4.1 (GCC) 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)
It works without problems with:
- gcc-3.4 (GCC) 3.4.6 (Ubuntu 3.4.6-6ubuntu2)
If I manually remove the '*INTERNAL*' from the asm file, it compiles correctly.
I found a similar old bug (6418) from the GCC3.04 version
--
Summary: weak constructor product unvalid asm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: william dot fink at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36107
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/36107] weak constructor product unvalid asm
2008-05-02 11:56 [Bug c++/36107] New: weak constructor product unvalid asm william dot fink at gmail dot com
@ 2008-05-05 5:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-05-05 5:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-05 05:10 -------
Even if the code assembled for 3.3.6 or 3.4.x, the weak reference was not being
emitted. So this is not a regression really.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2008-05-05 05:10:15
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36107
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-05 5:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-02 11:56 [Bug c++/36107] New: weak constructor product unvalid asm william dot fink at gmail dot com
2008-05-05 5:11 ` [Bug c++/36107] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).