public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/36107]  New: weak constructor product unvalid asm
@ 2008-05-02 11:56 william dot fink at gmail dot com
  2008-05-05  5:11 ` [Bug c++/36107] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: william dot fink at gmail dot com @ 2008-05-02 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

When using __attribute__((weak)) on a constructor, the produced assembly file
contains an extra *INTERNAL* on the constructor declaration line.

- Here is my test code:

class Test {
  public:
  Test() __attribute__((weak));
};

int test() {
  Test test;
}

- The compilation output:
$ g++ test.cc 
/tmp/cchKRpYD.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cchKRpYD.s:22: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is
`*'

- The corresponding asm line 22:
        .weak   _ZN4TestC1Ev *INTERNAL*

I have tried this with and it does not work for:
- gcc (GCC) 4.3.0 (compiled from sources)
- gcc-4.2 (GCC) 4.2.1 (Ubuntu 4.2.1-5ubuntu4)
- gcc-4.1 (GCC) 4.1.3 20070929 (prerelease) (Ubuntu 4.1.2-16ubuntu2)

It works without problems with:
- gcc-3.4 (GCC) 3.4.6 (Ubuntu 3.4.6-6ubuntu2)

If I manually remove the '*INTERNAL*' from the asm file, it compiles correctly.

I found a similar old bug (6418) from the GCC3.04 version


-- 
           Summary: weak constructor product unvalid asm
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: william dot fink at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36107


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/36107] weak constructor product unvalid asm
  2008-05-02 11:56 [Bug c++/36107] New: weak constructor product unvalid asm william dot fink at gmail dot com
@ 2008-05-05  5:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-05-05  5:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-05-05 05:10 -------
Even if the code assembled for 3.3.6 or 3.4.x, the weak reference was not being
emitted.  So this is not a regression really.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2008-05-05 05:10:15
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36107


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-05  5:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-02 11:56 [Bug c++/36107] New: weak constructor product unvalid asm william dot fink at gmail dot com
2008-05-05  5:11 ` [Bug c++/36107] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).