From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17237 invoked by alias); 6 Jun 2008 17:54:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 15536 invoked by uid 48); 6 Jun 2008 17:54:03 -0000 Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 17:54:00 -0000 Subject: [Bug preprocessor/36453] New: PR36320 breaks boost X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC Message-ID: Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org From: "mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org" Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-06/txt/msg00346.txt.bz2 testcase: === Cut === #if !defined(BOOST_PP_IS_ITERATING) #elif BOOST_PP_ITERATION_DEPTH() == 1 #endif === Cut === error: missing binary operator before token "(" from reading the PR36320, this behaviour doesn't seem to be intended. It was intended to only add a check for non-null argument. -- Summary: PR36320 breaks boost Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mueller at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36453