From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E17133858C98; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 06:50:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E17133858C98
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1710744644;
	bh=DcY6hK1H3N2vLtYpuoNNTnuvS8N1SC45OsAJzHX76G0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=gwYWBBOe23LeEcdIAUVs8lo8YNmABrzu4CUMdNm07tH5H+JuMrsIvCMXBRaDn79O0
	 VAg9jdrLlvtf2RvwotzQO9p6mVbaame95PxKtTDVPqC1pmq+KraiPgIrBdAmmY9hZz
	 lK6M3n38ubJhEgc/eOHyDfGKkbfo8VoW5IM4JfRE=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/36587] Feature: add warning for constructor call with
 discarded return.
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 06:50:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 7.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-36587-4-6od7gH5bxQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-36587-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-36587-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D36587

--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No, the nodiscard warnings must be silenced with a cast to void. They can't=
 be
"stronger" than that.=