public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/36587] Feature: add warning for constructor call with discarded return.
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-36587-4-ojHWTeUkTI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-36587-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36587

--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kaz Kylheku from comment #11)
> The bug database has an "enhancement" type, so obviously, it is to be used
> for submitting enhancements.

No, it's for submitting enhancement *requests*, i.e. asking for or suggesting
enhancements.

Patches implementing those enhancements should be sent to the gcc-patches list,
like all patches.

> Why would you duplicate effort by implementing
> a different process for tracking submissions?

The process for submitting patches has always been to send them to the
gcc-patches list for review, why would you duplicate effort by asking reviewers
to also track patches in bugzilla?


> In June 2008, when I submitted this, here is how the above Wiki page looked:
> 
> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GettingStarted?action=recall&rev=19
> 
> There is no mention of any special process at that time.

There is still no "special process", the process for submitting patches is
documented at https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches and has always been
to send them to the gcc-patches mailing list. That wiki page says nothing about
attaching patches to bugzilla, but it does link to
https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html which describes the patch submission
process.

Of course we welcome suggestions for enhancements, especially if they come with
patches implementing the suggestion (that's the best kind! :-) but the process
for submitting patches is to send them to the mailing list (and there are also
legal prerequisites to be met, as described at the link above).

If you're not interested in submitting the patch through that process that's
unfortunate. Maybe someone else will be interested enough to do so on your
behalf, but that won't happen automatically. There is no way to go through
bugzilla and find patches posted here that were never sent via the correct
process (there are thousands of attachments in bugzilla, some are testcases,
some are patches that don't work, some are patches which were committed after
being sent to the mailing list, some are patches that were superseded by
improved patches sent to the list ... there is no way to automatically process
them and find the ones that were never dealt with).


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-24 21:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-36587-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-09-24 21:49 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-24 21:52 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-23 13:51 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-24 18:47 ` kkylheku at gmail dot com
2015-07-24 21:21 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-07-24 22:29 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-16 23:32 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-18  2:44 ` kkylheku at gmail dot com
2024-03-18  2:53 ` kkylheku at gmail dot com
2024-03-18  6:50 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-18  7:20 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-03-18 16:18 ` kkylheku at gmail dot com
2008-06-20 19:22 [Bug c++/36587] New: " kkylheku at gmail dot com
2008-06-20 19:24 ` [Bug c++/36587] " kkylheku at gmail dot com
2008-06-20 20:27 ` kkylheku at gmail dot com
2009-12-11  0:37 ` redi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-12-11  2:34 ` kkylheku at gmail dot com
2009-12-11 10:39 ` jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com
2009-12-11 11:58 ` kkylheku at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-36587-4-ojHWTeUkTI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).