public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/37314]  New: seg violation
@ 2008-09-01 15:40 w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
  2008-09-01 15:43 ` [Bug c++/37314] " w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (24 more replies)
  0 siblings, 25 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de @ 2008-09-01 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

seg violation of compiler - previous versions compiled ok!


-- 
           Summary: seg violation
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.1.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: blocker
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
@ 2008-09-01 15:43 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
  2008-09-01 15:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (23 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de @ 2008-09-01 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de  2008-09-01 15:41 -------
Created an attachment (id=16180)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16180&action=view)
the ii file

the file you requested in your instructions on how to submit a bug report


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
  2008-09-01 15:43 ` [Bug c++/37314] " w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
@ 2008-09-01 15:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-09-01 15:52 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
                   ` (22 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-01 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-01 15:49 -------
Created an attachment (id=16181)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16181&action=view)
unincluded testcase


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
  2008-09-01 15:43 ` [Bug c++/37314] " w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
  2008-09-01 15:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-01 15:52 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
  2008-09-01 15:55 ` [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (21 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2008-09-01 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2008-09-01 15:50 -------
Note, 4_1-branch is closed. I would suggest first trying a newer compiler on
your code, e.g., 4.3.2.


-- 

paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|blocker                     |normal
            Summary|seg violation               |seg violation


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-01 15:52 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2008-09-01 15:55 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-09-01 15:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (20 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-01 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-01 15:53 -------
Confirmed.

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0000000000cd5495 in strip_array_types (type=0x0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree.c:5755
5755      while (TREE_CODE (type) == ARRAY_TYPE)
(gdb) up
#1  0x00000000005ad26d in cp_type_quals (type=0x0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c:7108
7108      type = strip_array_types (CONST_CAST_TREE(type));
(gdb) 
#2  0x0000000000585fb8 in original_type (t=0x0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c:236
236       int quals = cp_type_quals (t);
(gdb) 
#3  0x0000000000589136 in merge_types (t1=0x7fd7237a0900, t2=0x0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c:602
602       if (original_type (t1) == original_type (t2))
(gdb) 
#4  0x00000000005895ee in merge_types (t1=0x7fd7237a0a80, t2=0x7fd723765a80)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c:628
628             tree target = merge_types (TREE_TYPE (t1), TREE_TYPE (t2));
(gdb) call debug_tree (t1)
 <reference_type 0x7fd7237a0a80
    type <template_type_parm 0x7fd7237a0900 T VOID
        align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7fd7249b0f00
       index 0 level 1 orig_level 1
        reference_to_this <reference_type 0x7fd7237a0a80> chain <type_decl
0x7fd7237a09c0 T>>
    unsigned DI
    size <integer_cst 0x7fd7252fcb10 type <integer_type 0x7fd7253100c0
bit_size_type> constant 64>
    unit size <integer_cst 0x7fd7252fcb40 type <integer_type 0x7fd725310000
long unsigned int> constant 8>
    align 64 symtab 0 alias set -1 canonical type 0x7fd723fdf240>
(gdb) call debug_tree (t2)
 <typename_type 0x7fd723765a80 reference type_0 type_6 VOID
    align 8 symtab 0 alias set -1 structural equality context <record_type
0x7fd72375d9c0 Cdeque>
    chain <type_decl 0x7fd723765b40 reference>>


#0  0x0000000000cd5495 in strip_array_types (type=0x0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/tree.c:5755
#1  0x00000000005ad26d in cp_type_quals (type=0x0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c:7108
#2  0x0000000000585fb8 in original_type (t=0x0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c:236
#3  0x0000000000589136 in merge_types (t1=0x7fd7237a0900, t2=0x0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c:602
#4  0x00000000005895ee in merge_types (t1=0x7fd7237a0a80, t2=0x7fd723765a80)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c:628
#5  0x0000000000589d73 in merge_types (t1=0x7fd7237a0b40, t2=0x7fd72376c300)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c:675
#6  0x000000000058a454 in merge_types (t1=0x7fd7237a0b40, t2=0x7fd72376c300)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c:723
#7  0x000000000042f5ca in duplicate_decls (newdecl=0x7fd72377b400, 
    olddecl=0x7fd72376a500, newdecl_is_friend=0 '\0')
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c:1703
#8  0x000000000044cb25 in grokfndecl (ctype=0x7fd7237650c0, 
    type=0x7fd7237a0cc0, declarator=0x7fd72530e780, parms=0x7fd72379e360, 
    orig_declarator=0x7fd72530e780, virtualp=0, flags=NO_SPECIAL, quals=0, 
    raises=0x0, check=1, friendp=0, publicp=1, inlinep=0, sfk=sfk_none, 
    funcdef_flag=1 '\001', template_count=1, in_namespace=0x0, 
    attrlist=0x7fff2d43db28)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c:6802
#9  0x00000000004568e2 in grokdeclarator (declarator=0x1746bf0, 
    declspecs=0x7fff2d43dd00, decl_context=NORMAL, initialized=1, 
    attrlist=0x7fff2d43db28)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c:9255
#10 0x000000000046900f in start_function (declspecs=0x7fff2d43dd00, 
    declarator=0x1746c70, attrs=0x0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/decl.c:11698
#11 0x00000000005717a4 in
cp_parser_function_definition_from_specifiers_and_declarator
(parser=0x7fd724a137d0, decl_specifiers=0x7fff2d43dd00, attributes=0x0, 
    declarator=0x1746c70)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:17336
#12 0x0000000000568b31 in cp_parser_init_declarator (parser=0x7fd724a137d0, 
    decl_specifiers=0x7fff2d43dd00, checks=0x0, 
    function_definition_allowed_p=1 '\001', member_p=0 '\0', 
    declares_class_or_enum=0, function_definition_p=0x7fff2d43dcff "\001")
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:12584
#13 0x00000000005721f8 in cp_parser_single_declaration (parser=0x7fd724a137d0, 
    checks=0x0, member_p=0 '\0', explicit_specialization_p=0 '\0', 
    friend_p=0x7fff2d43ddb7 "")
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:17682
#14 0x0000000000571b94 in cp_parser_template_declaration_after_export (
    parser=0x7fd724a137d0, member_p=0 '\0')
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:17535
#15 0x000000000056434a in cp_parser_template_declaration (
    parser=0x7fd724a137d0, member_p=0 '\0')
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:9488
#16 0x00000000005624fd in cp_parser_declaration (parser=0x7fd724a137d0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:7884
#17 0x0000000000562298 in cp_parser_declaration_seq_opt (parser=0x7fd724a137d0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:7815
#18 0x0000000000567fd9 in cp_parser_namespace_body (parser=0x7fd724a137d0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:12028
#19 0x0000000000567f9f in cp_parser_namespace_definition (
    parser=0x7fd724a137d0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:12007
#20 0x00000000005625c5 in cp_parser_declaration (parser=0x7fd724a137d0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:7912
#21 0x0000000000562298 in cp_parser_declaration_seq_opt (parser=0x7fd724a137d0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:7815
#22 0x000000000055ada9 in cp_parser_translation_unit (parser=0x7fd724a137d0)
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:3031
#23 0x000000000057bdfd in c_parse_file ()
    at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/cp/parser.c:21886


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |blocker
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code
      Known to fail|                            |4.1.2 4.2.0 4.2.4 4.3.2
                   |                            |4.4.0
      Known to work|                            |4.0.4 4.1.1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2008-09-01 15:53:55
               date|                            |
            Summary|seg violation               |[4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg
                   |                            |violation
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.2.5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-01 15:55 ` [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-01 15:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-09-01 16:02 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
                   ` (19 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-01 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-01 15:56 -------
Reducing.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-01 15:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-01 16:02 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
  2008-09-01 16:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (18 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2008-09-01 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2008-09-01 16:01 -------
Thanks Richard.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-01 16:02 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2008-09-01 16:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-09-01 16:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-01 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-01 16:02 -------
Reduced testcase:

template <typename T>
class Cdeque {
    typedef T *pointer;
    class iterator {
        typedef typename Cdeque<T>::pointer pointer;
        pointer operator->();
    };
};
template <typename T> T* Cdeque<T>::iterator::operator->() { }


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-01 16:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-01 16:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-09-01 16:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-01 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-01 16:03 -------
Which I guess is invalid because the definition of Cdeque is not complete
at the time we bind iterator::pointer to Cdeque<T>::pointer.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-01 16:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-01 16:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-09-01 16:15 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-01 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-01 16:05 -------
Though EDG accepts it (but of course nothing is instantiated here).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-01 16:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-01 16:15 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
  2008-09-01 16:40 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de @ 2008-09-01 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #10 from w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de  2008-09-01 16:14 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation

Hi,
thanks for taking the time to look at my problem.
I did try with version 4.2 and fared no better.
Versions up to 4.0.x compile ok.
Let me know if I can be of further assistance as I am quite stuck at the 
moment.
Best regards, wdoeringer

On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

>
>
> ------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-01 16:05 -------
> Though EDG accepts it (but of course nothing is instantiated here).
>
>
>


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-01 16:15 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
@ 2008-09-01 16:40 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
  2008-09-03 19:32 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de @ 2008-09-01 16:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #11 from w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de  2008-09-01 16:39 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation

Hi,
I have added some substance to the reduced testcase, so that now actual 
code is generated. You find it in the attached file.
It compiles well under g++ 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. Build 5456)
but crashes under
4.2.1 (Ubuntu 4.2.1-5ubuntu4) and under 4.1.3
Best regards, wd.doeringer

On Mon, 1 Sep 2008, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:

>
>
> ------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-01 16:05 -------
> Though EDG accepts it (but of course nothing is instantiated here).
>
>
>


------- Comment #12 from w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de  2008-09-01 16:39 -------
Created an attachment (id=16182)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16182&action=view)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-01 16:40 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
@ 2008-09-03 19:32 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
  2008-09-04 16:49 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de @ 2008-09-03 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #13 from w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de  2008-09-03 19:30 -------
Created an attachment (id=16214)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16214&action=view)
very small testcase 

this is a ten-line testcase clearly pointing to a problem with type-resolution
regards w.doeringer@fh-worms.de


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-03 19:32 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
@ 2008-09-04 16:49 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
  2008-09-05 23:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de @ 2008-09-04 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #14 from w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de  2008-09-04 16:48 -------
Created an attachment (id=16223)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16223&action=view)
compiler error on valid code

might point to the problem causing the seg fault


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-04 16:49 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
@ 2008-09-05 23:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-09-20 14:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-05 23:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
           Severity|blocker                     |normal


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-05 23:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-09-20 14:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-11-30 23:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-09-20 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-09-20 14:41 -------
The question remains if this is invalid or valid code.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jason at redhat dot com
             Status|NEW                         |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-09-20 14:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-30 23:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-01 16:31 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-30 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
           Priority|P3                          |P2
   Last reconfirmed|2008-09-01 15:53:55         |2008-11-30 23:06:48
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-11-30 23:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-01 16:31 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-02-03 12:51 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-01 16:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #16 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-01 16:29 -------
(In reply to comment #8)
> Which I guess is invalid because the definition of Cdeque is not complete
> at the time we bind iterator::pointer to Cdeque<T>::pointer.

This is not an issue because Cdeque<T>::pointer is a member of the current
instantiation (per 14.6.2.1).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-01 16:31 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-03 12:51 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
  2009-02-03 13:16 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2009-02-03 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #17 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2009-02-03 12:51 -------
The failure happens because structural_comptypes calls resolve_typename_type,
while merge_types does not.  Maybe it should as in this patch?

Index: ../../peak-gcc-src/gcc/cp/typeck.c
===================================================================
--- ../../peak-gcc-src/gcc/cp/typeck.c  (revision 143676)
+++ ../../peak-gcc-src/gcc/cp/typeck.c  (working copy)
@@ -606,6 +606,11 @@ merge_types (tree t1, tree t2)
   if (TYPE_PTRMEMFUNC_P (t2))
     t2 = TYPE_PTRMEMFUNC_FN_TYPE (t2);

+  if (TREE_CODE (t1) == TYPENAME_TYPE)
+    t1 = resolve_typename_type (t2, /*only_current_p=*/true);
+  if (TREE_CODE (t2) == TYPENAME_TYPE)
+    t2 = resolve_typename_type (t2, /*only_current_p=*/true);
+
   code1 = TREE_CODE (t1);
   code2 = TREE_CODE (t2);



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-02-03 12:51 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-03 13:16 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
  2009-02-03 13:40 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2009-02-03 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #18 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2009-02-03 13:16 -------
(In reply to comment #17)
> +  if (TREE_CODE (t1) == TYPENAME_TYPE)
> +    t1 = resolve_typename_type (t2, /*only_current_p=*/true);

But I suppose you want consistently t1 here ;)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (18 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-02-03 13:16 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2009-02-03 13:40 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
  2009-02-03 15:56 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2009-02-03 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #19 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2009-02-03 13:40 -------
Test.cpp is a rejects-valid.


-- 

bonzini at gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |rejects-valid


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (19 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-02-03 13:40 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-03 15:56 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-02-03 16:21 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-03 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #20 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2009-02-03 15:56 -------
Subject: Bug 37314

Author: bonzini
Date: Tue Feb  3 15:56:05 2009
New Revision: 143896

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143896
Log:
gcc/cp:
2009-02-03  Paolo Bonzini  <bonzini@gnu.org>

        PR c++/36897
        * pt.c (convert_nontype_argument_function): Expect expr to be an
        ADDR_EXPR.

        PR c++/37314
        * typeck.c (merge_types): Call resolve_typename_type if only
        one type is a typename.

gcc/testsuite:
2009-02-03  Paolo Bonzini  <bonzini@gnu.org>

        PR c++/36897
        * g++.dg/template/func2.C: New test.

        PR c++/37314
        * g++.dg/template/typename15.C: New.
        * g++.dg/template/typename16.C: New.


Added:
    branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/func2.C
    branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/typename15.C
    branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/typename16.C
Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/pt.c
    branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/cp/typeck.c
    branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (20 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-02-03 15:56 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-03 16:21 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
  2009-02-03 16:23 ` [Bug c++/37314] [4.2 " paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gnu dot org @ 2009-02-03 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #21 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2009-02-03 16:21 -------
fixed on 4.3/4.4, still needs backporting to 4.2


-- 

bonzini at gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|4.1.2 4.2.0 4.2.4 4.3.2     |4.1.2 4.2.0 4.2.4 4.3.3
                   |4.4.0                       |
      Known to work|4.0.4 4.1.1                 |4.0.4 4.1.1 4.3.4 4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (21 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-02-03 16:21 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-03 16:23 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
  2009-02-03 16:27 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-03-31 15:48 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com @ 2009-02-03 16:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #22 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com  2009-02-03 16:22 -------
Likewise... ;)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (22 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-02-03 16:23 ` [Bug c++/37314] [4.2 " paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2009-02-03 16:27 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-03-31 15:48 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-03 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #23 from bonzini at gnu dot org  2009-02-03 16:26 -------
Subject: Bug 37314

Author: bonzini
Date: Tue Feb  3 16:26:28 2009
New Revision: 143898

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=143898
Log:
gcc/cp:
2009-02-03  Paolo Bonzini  <bonzini@gnu.org>

        PR c++/36897
        * pt.c (convert_nontype_argument_function): Expect expr to be an
        ADDR_EXPR.

        PR c++/37314
        * typeck.c (merge_types): Call resolve_typename_type if only
        one type is a typename.

gcc/testsuite:
2009-02-03  Paolo Bonzini  <bonzini@gnu.org>

        PR c++/36897
        * g++.dg/template/func2.C: New test.

        PR c++/37314
        * g++.dg/template/typename15.C: New.
        * g++.dg/template/typename16.C: New.


Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/func2.C
      - copied unchanged from r143896,
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/func2.C
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/typename15.C
      - copied unchanged from r143896,
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/typename15.C
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/typename16.C
      - copied unchanged from r143896,
branches/gcc-4_3-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/typename16.C
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/cp/pt.c
    trunk/gcc/cp/typeck.c
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/37314] [4.2 Regression] seg violation
  2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
                   ` (23 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-02-03 16:27 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-31 15:48 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  24 siblings, 0 replies; 26+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-31 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #24 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-31 15:48 -------
Closing 4.2 branch, fixed for 4.3.4 and 4.4.


-- 

jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
      Known to fail|4.1.2 4.2.0 4.2.4 4.3.3     |4.1.2 4.2.0 4.2.4 4.3.3
                   |                            |4.2.5
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|4.2.5                       |4.3.4


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37314


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 26+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-31 15:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-09-01 15:40 [Bug c++/37314] New: seg violation w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
2008-09-01 15:43 ` [Bug c++/37314] " w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
2008-09-01 15:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-01 15:52 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2008-09-01 15:55 ` [Bug c++/37314] [4.2/4.3/4.4 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-01 15:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-01 16:02 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2008-09-01 16:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-01 16:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-01 16:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-01 16:15 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
2008-09-01 16:40 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
2008-09-03 19:32 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
2008-09-04 16:49 ` w dot doeringer at fh-worms dot de
2008-09-05 23:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-20 14:43 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-30 23:08 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-01 16:31 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-03 12:51 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-02-03 13:16 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-02-03 13:40 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-02-03 15:56 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-03 16:21 ` bonzini at gnu dot org
2009-02-03 16:23 ` [Bug c++/37314] [4.2 " paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-02-03 16:27 ` bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-31 15:48 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).