From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-341665-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22055 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2010 02:04:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 22044 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Dec 2010 02:04:30 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 02:04:26 +0000
From: "dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/37336] Fortran 2003: Finish derived-type finalization
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: domob at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-37336-4-4tsPUr56DH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-37336-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-37336-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 02:04:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg02648.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336

Daniel Franke <dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Daniel Franke <dfranke at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-27 02:04:07 UTC ---
I had the vague impression that FINAL was already completed, so I gave it a try
... 

polytest.f90:28.22:

  SUBROUTINE free(this)
                      1
Error: Argument of FINAL procedure at (1) must be of type 'abstract_weight'

for
  SUBROUTINE free(this)
    CLASS(abstract_weight), INTENT(inout) :: this
    ! ...
  END SUBROUTINE

Placing the error marker at CLASS() and rewording to "must be of
'TYPE(abstract_weight)'" might ease some confusion. It took me a while to
figure out what's wrong ^^

However, any plans to get this completed in the foreseeable future?