From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7393E385C6CD; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:44:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7393E385C6CD
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1718628268;
	bh=aGRACxBj1ufn7WguyfNdyB4rqK6LFsSEVG+rPkSsQjE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=XGH0gAv97cCZaQYqynSz1tYl1mF7ONx/uJuejkTgFc5MV/7CkVMohCaO95Rx9KmOF
	 TrDsVso0bwytazBugnqkvDSK6jLw9sP2Zad2xfLJg/eM2IZj/dnzCJiBS2VUM/8aY9
	 uP7MNE7is8Am98UL2TudS5Io0e+uKh4bxXuJgaqI=
From: "kristian.spangsege at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/37475] codecvt::do_in/do_out functions return "ok"
 when the output sequence has zero length
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 12:44:24 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: kristian.spangsege at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-37475-4-rG5bCurBGT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-37475-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-37475-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D37475

--- Comment #14 from Kristian Spangsege <kristian.spangsege at gmail dot co=
m> ---
Is the underscore intended before `Guard` in `explicit _Guard(__c_locale) {=
 }`
for the GLIBC <=3D 2.2 case?

Besides that, the full patch looks correct to me.=