From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14254 invoked by alias); 1 Apr 2014 16:02:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 14199 invoked by uid 48); 1 Apr 2014 16:02:05 -0000 From: "dje at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/378] [AIX] gcc cannot compile huge c file Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 16:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.95.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: dje at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: SUSPENDED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dje at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00068.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=378 --- Comment #11 from David Edelsohn --- Recent releases of GCC are built with linker options to allow larger data section. Are the user process limits (ulimit) set large enough? One could rebuild GCC cc1 and cc1plus with even larger -bmaxdata value (or patch the binary with a larger value), but it's not clear which limit is hit.