public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug bootstrap/37808]  New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
@ 2008-10-12  2:02 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2008-10-12  2:03 ` [Bug bootstrap/37808] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (11 more replies)
  0 siblings, 12 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-10-12  2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1775 bytes --]

Revision 141067

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-10/msg00270.html

breaks bootstrap on Linux/x86:

[hjl@gnu-33 libgcc]$ /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/./gcc/xgcc
-B/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/bld/./gcc/
-B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/usr/local/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include -g -O2 -m32 -O2  -g -O2
-DIN_GCC   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wcast-qual -Wold-style-definition  -isystem ./include  -fPIC -g
-DHAVE_GTHR_DEFAULT -DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED   -I. -I.
-I../../.././gcc -I../../../../src-trunk/libgcc
-I../../../../src-trunk/libgcc/. -I../../../../src-trunk/libgcc/../gcc
-I../../../../src-trunk/libgcc/../include
-I../../../../src-trunk/libgcc/config/libbid -DENABLE_DECIMAL_BID_FORMAT
-DHAVE_CC_TLS -DUSE_TLS -o _muldc3.o -MT _muldc3.o -MD -MP -MF _mulsc3.dep
-DL_mulsc3 -c ../../../../src-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c \
>         -fvisibility=hidden -DHIDE_EXPORTS
../../../../src-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function â__mulsc3â:
../../../../src-trunk/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1890: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
[hjl@gnu-33 libgcc]$


-- 
           Summary: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37808


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug bootstrap/37808] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
  2008-10-12  2:02 [Bug bootstrap/37808] New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-10-12  2:03 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2008-10-12  2:21 ` [Bug target/37808] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2008-10-12  2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2008-10-12 02:02 -------
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x000000000063d28e in df_set_bb_dirty (bb=0x0)
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/df-core.c:1427
1427                bitmap_set_bit (dflow->out_of_date_transfer_functions,
bb->index);
(gdb) bt
#0  0x000000000063d28e in df_set_bb_dirty (bb=0x0)
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/df-core.c:1427
#1  0x0000000000659318 in df_ref_change_reg_with_loc_1 (old_df=0x255ebd8,
    new_df=0x255ec08, new_regno=3, loc=0x7ffff331cf80)
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/df-scan.c:1983
#2  0x0000000000659451 in df_ref_change_reg_with_loc (old_regno=2,
    new_regno=3, loc=0x7ffff331cf80) at ../../src-trunk/gcc/df-scan.c:2027
#3  0x000000000118e246 in ix86_output_function_epilogue (file=0x249ca40,
    size=36) at ../../src-trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386.c:8323
#4  0x00000000007188d4 in final_end_function ()
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/final.c:1636
#5  0x000000000071c5e4 in rest_of_handle_final ()
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/final.c:4153
#6  0x00000000008e55e6 in execute_one_pass (pass=0x234f0e0)
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/passes.c:1279
#7  0x00000000008e5773 in execute_pass_list (pass=0x234f0e0)
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/passes.c:1327
#8  0x00000000008e5791 in execute_pass_list (pass=0x23d0780)
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/passes.c:1328
#9  0x00000000008e5791 in execute_pass_list (pass=0x23d0720)
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/passes.c:1328
#10 0x0000000000c647dc in tree_rest_of_compilation (fndecl=0x7ffff340f600)
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/tree-optimize.c:418
---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
#11 0x00000000011f06a2 in cgraph_expand_function (node=0x7ffff2fd9400)
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1038
#12 0x00000000011f0856 in cgraph_expand_all_functions ()
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1097
#13 0x00000000011f0de8 in cgraph_optimize ()
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1302
#14 0x000000000043524a in c_write_global_declarations ()
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/c-decl.c:8073
#15 0x0000000000ae761f in compile_file () at ../../src-trunk/gcc/toplev.c:979
#16 0x0000000000ae923d in do_compile () at ../../src-trunk/gcc/toplev.c:2190
#17 0x0000000000ae92a1 in toplev_main (argc=15, argv=0x7fffffffe388)
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/toplev.c:2222
#18 0x0000000000509e6b in main (argc=15, argv=0x7fffffffe388)
    at ../../src-trunk/gcc/main.c:35
(gdb)


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37808


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37808] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
  2008-10-12  2:02 [Bug bootstrap/37808] New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2008-10-12  2:03 ` [Bug bootstrap/37808] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2008-10-12  2:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-10-12  4:57 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-10-12  2:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-10-12 02:20 -------
This a target specific failure. 


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|bootstrap                   |target
 GCC target triplet|                            |i?86-*-* x86_64-*-*
           Keywords|                            |build, ice-on-valid-code
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37808


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37808] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
  2008-10-12  2:02 [Bug bootstrap/37808] New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2008-10-12  2:03 ` [Bug bootstrap/37808] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2008-10-12  2:21 ` [Bug target/37808] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-10-12  4:57 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
  2008-10-12 16:58 ` gcc-bugzilla at daryl dot haresign dot com
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: zadeck at naturalbridge dot com @ 2008-10-12  4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com  2008-10-12 04:56 -------
Created an attachment (id=16485)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16485&action=view)
possible patch to fix the problem

I am pretty sure that this fixes it, but i need to do more testing.

kenny


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37808


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37808] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
  2008-10-12  2:02 [Bug bootstrap/37808] New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-10-12  4:57 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
@ 2008-10-12 16:58 ` gcc-bugzilla at daryl dot haresign dot com
  2008-10-12 17:52 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: gcc-bugzilla at daryl dot haresign dot com @ 2008-10-12 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from gcc-bugzilla at daryl dot haresign dot com  2008-10-12 16:57 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Created an attachment (id=16485)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16485&action=view) [edit]
> possible patch to fix the problem
> 
> I am pretty sure that this fixes it, but i need to do more testing.
> 
> kenny
> 

I too had this ICE. The patch seems to make it work nicely.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37808


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37808] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
  2008-10-12  2:02 [Bug bootstrap/37808] New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-10-12 16:58 ` gcc-bugzilla at daryl dot haresign dot com
@ 2008-10-12 17:52 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
  2008-10-12 19:45 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr @ 2008-10-12 17:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr  2008-10-12 17:50 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> I too had this ICE. The patch seems to make it work nicely.

Same thing here on i686-apple-darwin9. The test suite (all languages but ada)
passed without regression. 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37808


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37808] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
  2008-10-12  2:02 [Bug bootstrap/37808] New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-10-12 17:52 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
@ 2008-10-12 19:45 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-10-12 20:32 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-10-12 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-10-12 19:44 -------
Confirmed, the regression tester sees it too.


-- 

geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2008-10-12 19:44:11
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37808


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37808] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
  2008-10-12  2:02 [Bug bootstrap/37808] New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-10-12 19:45 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-10-12 20:32 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-10-12 21:14 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-10-12 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-10-12 20:31 -------
I see a failure on sparc-solaris8/10 too. Configury of stage2 fails.
Applying the mentioned patch cures compilation.
My sparc config is with multilib. 32-bit/64-bit.


-- 

andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2008-10-12 19:44:11         |2008-10-12 20:31:02
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37808


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37808] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
  2008-10-12  2:02 [Bug bootstrap/37808] New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-10-12 20:32 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-10-12 21:14 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
  2008-10-12 21:18 ` richard dot guenther at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: zadeck at naturalbridge dot com @ 2008-10-12 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com  2008-10-12 21:13 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86

andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> ------- Comment #7 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-10-12 20:31 -------
> I see a failure on sparc-solaris8/10 too. Configury of stage2 fails.
> Applying the mentioned patch cures compilation.
> My sparc config is with multilib. 32-bit/64-bit.
>
>
>   
The problem is that the bb is no longer kept in the df-ref, and is
instead extracted from the insn.
This particular problem was caused by insns being deleted in a pass that
defers rescanning but that also changes register numbers.   The fix
checks to make sure the insn is still in a basic block before trying to
mark the block as being dirty.

2008-10-12  Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com>

    PR middle-end/37808
    * df-scan.c (df_ref_change_reg_with_loc_1): Added test to make
    sure that ref has valid bb.

Tested by me on both x86-32 and x86-64.   Also tested by andreast on
spark-solaris and by keating.

OK to commit?

kenny
Index: df-scan.c
===================================================================
--- df-scan.c   (revision 141071)
+++ df-scan.c   (working copy)
@@ -1980,7 +1980,8 @@ df_ref_change_reg_with_loc_1 (struct df_
            DF_REF_PREV_REG (new_df->reg_chain) = the_ref;
          new_df->reg_chain = the_ref;
          new_df->n_refs++;
-         df_set_bb_dirty (DF_REF_BB (the_ref));
+         if (DF_REF_BB (the_ref))
+           df_set_bb_dirty (DF_REF_BB (the_ref));

          /* Need to sort the record again that the ref was in because
             the regno is a sorting key.  First, find the right


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37808


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37808] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
  2008-10-12  2:02 [Bug bootstrap/37808] New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-10-12 21:14 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
@ 2008-10-12 21:18 ` richard dot guenther at gmail dot com
  2008-10-12 21:19 ` zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: richard dot guenther at gmail dot com @ 2008-10-12 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from richard dot guenther at gmail dot com  2008-10-12 21:17 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86

On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Kenneth Zadeck
<zadeck@naturalbridge.com> wrote:
> andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>> ------- Comment #7 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-10-12 20:31 -------
>> I see a failure on sparc-solaris8/10 too. Configury of stage2 fails.
>> Applying the mentioned patch cures compilation.
>> My sparc config is with multilib. 32-bit/64-bit.
>>
>>
>>
> The problem is that the bb is no longer kept in the df-ref, and is
> instead extracted from the insn.
> This particular problem was caused by insns being deleted in a pass that
> defers rescanning but that also changes register numbers.   The fix
> checks to make sure the insn is still in a basic block before trying to
> mark the block as being dirty.

Ok.  I think it's odd that we keep refs to deleted insns - but that's probably
because of the deferred re-scan, right?

Thanks,
Richard.

> 2008-10-12  Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com>
>
>    PR middle-end/37808
>    * df-scan.c (df_ref_change_reg_with_loc_1): Added test to make
>    sure that ref has valid bb.
>
> Tested by me on both x86-32 and x86-64.   Also tested by andreast on
> spark-solaris and by keating.
>
> OK to commit?
>
> kenny
>


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37808


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37808] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
  2008-10-12  2:02 [Bug bootstrap/37808] New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-10-12 21:18 ` richard dot guenther at gmail dot com
@ 2008-10-12 21:19 ` zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-10-12 21:20 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
  2008-10-12 21:23 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-10-12 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #10 from zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-10-12 21:18 -------
Subject: Bug 37808

Author: zadeck
Date: Sun Oct 12 21:16:57 2008
New Revision: 141078

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141078
Log:
2008-10-12  Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com>

        PR middle-end/37808
        * df-scan.c (df_ref_change_reg_with_loc_1): Added test to make
        sure that ref has valid bb.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/df-scan.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37808


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37808] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
  2008-10-12  2:02 [Bug bootstrap/37808] New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-10-12 21:19 ` zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-10-12 21:20 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
  2008-10-12 21:23 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: zadeck at naturalbridge dot com @ 2008-10-12 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #11 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com  2008-10-12 21:19 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86

Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 11:12 PM, Kenneth Zadeck
> <zadeck@naturalbridge.com> wrote:
>   
>> andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>>     
>>> ------- Comment #7 from andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-10-12 20:31 -------
>>> I see a failure on sparc-solaris8/10 too. Configury of stage2 fails.
>>> Applying the mentioned patch cures compilation.
>>> My sparc config is with multilib. 32-bit/64-bit.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> The problem is that the bb is no longer kept in the df-ref, and is
>> instead extracted from the insn.
>> This particular problem was caused by insns being deleted in a pass that
>> defers rescanning but that also changes register numbers.   The fix
>> checks to make sure the insn is still in a basic block before trying to
>> mark the block as being dirty.
>>     
>
> Ok.  I think it's odd that we keep refs to deleted insns - but that's probably
> because of the deferred re-scan, right?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
>   
yes, this only is because of the deferred rescan.

committed as revision 14178.

kenny
>   
>> 2008-10-12  Kenneth Zadeck <zadeck@naturalbridge.com>
>>
>>    PR middle-end/37808
>>    * df-scan.c (df_ref_change_reg_with_loc_1): Added test to make
>>    sure that ref has valid bb.
>>
>> Tested by me on both x86-32 and x86-64.   Also tested by andreast on
>> spark-solaris and by keating.
>>
>> OK to commit?
>>
>> kenny
>>
>>     


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37808


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/37808] [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86
  2008-10-12  2:02 [Bug bootstrap/37808] New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-10-12 21:20 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
@ 2008-10-12 21:23 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
  11 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: zadeck at naturalbridge dot com @ 2008-10-12 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #12 from zadeck at naturalbridge dot com  2008-10-12 21:22 -------
fixed with the above patch.


-- 

zadeck at naturalbridge dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37808


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-12 21:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-12  2:02 [Bug bootstrap/37808] New: [4.4 Regression]: Revision 141067 breaks Linux/x86 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-10-12  2:03 ` [Bug bootstrap/37808] " hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2008-10-12  2:21 ` [Bug target/37808] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-12  4:57 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2008-10-12 16:58 ` gcc-bugzilla at daryl dot haresign dot com
2008-10-12 17:52 ` dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
2008-10-12 19:45 ` geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-12 20:32 ` andreast at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-12 21:14 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2008-10-12 21:18 ` richard dot guenther at gmail dot com
2008-10-12 21:19 ` zadeck at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-10-12 21:20 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com
2008-10-12 21:23 ` zadeck at naturalbridge dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).