From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-264232-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 911 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2008 04:01:53 -0000
Received: (qmail 669 invoked by uid 48); 15 Oct 2008 04:00:33 -0000
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 04:01:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug fortran/37832]  New: System_Clock
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-37832-16834@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "DavidLNewton at yahoo dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00959.txt.bz2

Resolution of the System_Clock(TICKS,RATE,MAX) intrinsic degraded from about
3.6 MHz to 1,000 Hz when I upgraded from g77 to gfortran (for Windows).

There is a computer clock that I have accessed in Visual Basic that represents
elapsed time since my computer was turned on, returned as an integer*8
quantity, which operates at the higher frequency.

It should be possible for you to offer something similar by re-writing
System_Clock(TICKS,RATE,MAX) to operate at the higher frequency (as it was in
g77) and return TICKS as an integer*8.


-- 
           Summary: System_Clock
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: DavidLNewton at yahoo dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37832