From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-417615-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21495 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2013 20:10:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 21258 invoked by uid 48); 13 Mar 2013 20:09:50 -0000
From: "steven at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/38134] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] speed regression with many loop invariants
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 20:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: steven at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.4
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-38134-4-ApLe31QPWc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-38134-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-38134-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg01057.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38134

--- Comment #21 from Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-03-13 20:09:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Ok, the goal would be to have all !targetm.legitimate_constant_p () 
> constants assigned to a pseudo (and in GIMPLE to an SSA name).

I'm not sure this would be a very useful thing to do.  What is a legitimate
constant for one insn may be non-legit for another.  You may end up doing
more harm than good...