public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions
       [not found] <bug-38205-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2013-06-25 17:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-06-25 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38205

Bug 38205 depends on bug 29962, which changed state.

Bug 29962 Summary: Initialization expressions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions
  2008-11-20 22:57 [Bug fortran/38205] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-09 21:54 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-03-23 19:57 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-03-23 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-03-23 19:56 -------


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29962 ***


-- 

dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38205


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions
  2008-11-20 22:57 [Bug fortran/38205] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-11-26 17:51 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-09 21:54 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-03-23 19:57 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-09 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-09 21:51 -------
Close as dupe of PR29962?


-- 

dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38205


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions
  2008-11-20 22:57 [Bug fortran/38205] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-11-26 16:53 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-26 17:51 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-09 21:54 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-03-23 19:57 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-26 17:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-11-26 17:49 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Currently not simplified are:
> - ALL/ANY/COUNT
> - cshift/eoshift
> - dot_product/matmul
> - (max|min)(loc|val) - note: (max|min)val is implemented for rank == 1 w/o dim
> - pack/unpack
> - spread
> - transpose
> 
... and sum.

Ok, I missed that. That's much more work than expected. :-(
Wouldn't there be so many gfc_simplify* in place, I would rather go for a
wrapper to call libgfortran's functions at compile time. 


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38205


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions
  2008-11-20 22:57 [Bug fortran/38205] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-11-26 13:51 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-26 16:53 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-11-26 17:51 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-26 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-11-26 16:52 -------
> I think that patch is not enough (though useful!). I think one needs to add a
> gfc_simplify_sum to simplify.c

One probably needs an auxiliary function which iterates through an array either
along a dim= (-> return a scalar) or if not present, it returns a expr->rank
sized array. To be used with PRODUCT and SUM at least. gfc_simplify_reshape
might give some idea, though that assumes that source is a rank == 1 array.
(Maybe get_expr_storage_size gives also some ideas.)

Currently not simplified are:
- ALL/ANY/COUNT
- cshift/eoshift
- dot_product/matmul
- (max|min)(loc|val) - note: (max|min)val is implemented for rank == 1 w/o dim
- pack/unpack
- spread
- transpose


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38205


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions
  2008-11-20 22:57 [Bug fortran/38205] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-11-26 12:14 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-26 13:51 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-11-26 16:53 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-26 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-11-26 13:50 -------
I think that patch is not enough (though useful!). I think one needs to add a
gfc_simplify_sum to simplify.c and replace then the NULL by the function name
in intrinsic.c for "sum". Possibly as well for the other transformational
intrinsics which are allowed in initialization expressions.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38205


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions
  2008-11-20 22:57 [Bug fortran/38205] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-11-22 21:43 ` [Bug fortran/38205] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-11-26 12:14 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-26 12:14 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-11-26 13:51 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-26 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-11-26 12:13 -------
confirmed


-- 

mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2008-11-26 12:13:31
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38205


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions
  2008-11-20 22:57 [Bug fortran/38205] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-11-22 21:43 ` [Bug fortran/38205] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-26 12:14 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-11-26 12:14 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-26 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-11-26 12:13 -------
Created an attachment (id=16775)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16775&action=view)
untested fix

This is probably the way to go. 
A warning should be added in some cases (didn't think much about it).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38205


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions
  2008-11-20 22:57 [Bug fortran/38205] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-22 21:43 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-11-26 12:14 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-22 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-11-22 21:41 -------
See also James' new c.l.f post:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/e0d04d755453a2a5


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38205


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-25 17:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-38205-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-06-25 17:17 ` [Bug fortran/38205] Tranformational function SUM rejected in initialization expressions dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2008-11-20 22:57 [Bug fortran/38205] New: " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-22 21:43 ` [Bug fortran/38205] " burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-26 12:14 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-26 12:14 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-26 13:51 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-26 16:53 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-26 17:51 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-09 21:54 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-03-23 19:57 ` dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).