From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7B3AE3858D39; Fri, 26 May 2023 00:40:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7B3AE3858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1685061623;
	bh=YHTY8aneiB/0rqEXrGdd1LOIQK4JxY/GMJ21loABs8k=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=pjMZESsa5DLeFOxL6hxibrcdO5aPHuqfQpesChV391CE8HMPlfFrcnCLRdjPJD/ZM
	 D/rASDFcrvxe8jzJI5hTyPdKGdZBNEcCNvSQRB0NlC2B4OhrtxVeHGLIkFkYlS0JbE
	 gL+wIpOSJQ3+6kmOkEXkHGgx8s1rWl8uOKYDWNy0=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/38264] tree_forwarder_block_p says no to first basic
 block
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 00:40:22 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-38264-4-3alsC5XEtu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-38264-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-38264-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D38264

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Confirmed.
> The code looks slightly different now as find_edge has been inlined and
> merged with checking for eh edges.

Which was done with r0-95726-g1d65f45cfaefa0 .

The code is still there today.
I am not sure if this issue still applies, almost 15 years after it was fil=
ed.=