public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/38268] New: gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris
@ 2008-11-25 21:47 mt1 at systella dot fr
2008-11-26 3:54 ` [Bug fortran/38268] " jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mt1 at systella dot fr @ 2008-11-25 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1806 bytes --]
tchaikovski:[/usr/shared-apps/lib/gcc] > gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.10
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr/shared-apps
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-shared --enable-threads=solaris
--enable-nls --enable-checking=release --with-mpfr=/usr/shared-apps/
--with-gmp=/usr/shared-apps/ --enable-multilib --without-gnu-ld
--with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld
Thread model: solaris
gcc version 4.3.2 (GCC)
Test program :
tchaikovski:[~/rpl/programmes] > cat test.f90
program TEST
write(*,*) 'Hello, world'
end
Tests :
tchaikovski:[~/rpl/programmes] > gfortran -m64 test.f90
tchaikovski:[~/rpl/programmes] > ./a.out
ld.so.1: a.out: fatal : /usr/shared-apps/lib/libgfortran.so.3 : classe ELF
erronée : ELFCLASS32
Tué
tchaikovski:[~/rpl/programmes] > gfortran test.f90
tchaikovski:[~/rpl/programmes] > ./a.out
Hello, world
gcc works fine and I can build a 64bits test program :
tchaikovski:[~/rpl/programmes] > gcc -m64 test.c
tchaikovski:[~/rpl/programmes] > ./a.out
Hello, World
There is no error on link stage, but gfortran tries to link program with 32
bits libraries, not with 64 bits one even I force -m64. On linux sparc64,
gfortran works fine. All gfortran 64 bits related libraries are available in
sparcv9 subdirectory.
Regards,
JKB
--
Summary: gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: mt1 at systella dot fr
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.10
GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.10
GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38268
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38268] gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris
2008-11-25 21:47 [Bug fortran/38268] New: gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris mt1 at systella dot fr
@ 2008-11-26 3:54 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-26 7:19 ` mt1 at systella dot fr
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-26 3:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 03:53 -------
I have been given access to a mchine with this architecture and have not, after
several evenings at it, been able to complete a single build of gfortran. I
notice some instructions on the gcc web page about some recommended linker to
use.
I suspect there are some configuration issues going on here that we need to
nail down. Do we have a "solaris" gcc maintainer around?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38268
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38268] gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris
2008-11-25 21:47 [Bug fortran/38268] New: gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris mt1 at systella dot fr
2008-11-26 3:54 ` [Bug fortran/38268] " jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-26 7:19 ` mt1 at systella dot fr
2008-11-26 7:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mt1 at systella dot fr @ 2008-11-26 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from mt1 at systella dot fr 2008-11-26 07:17 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> I have been given access to a mchine with this architecture and have not, after
> several evenings at it, been able to complete a single build of gfortran. I
> notice some instructions on the gcc web page about some recommended linker to
> use.
>
> I suspect there are some configuration issues going on here that we need to
> nail down. Do we have a "solaris" gcc maintainer around?
>
I have built GNU binutils on Solaris. If I use GNU-ld, gcc runs fine in 32 bits
mode, but is unable to link any 64 bits applications (GNU ld takes 64 bits gcc
libraries but tries to link a 32 bits program !). Thus it is not possible to
build a 64 bits gcc on solaris with GNU-ld and I have built my gcc with Solaris
ld.
If i use only gfortran to compile (gfortran -c) a test program, I haven't find
any option to link and run this object.
I suspect a path mistake when gfortran calls ld wrapper.
Regards,
JKB
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38268
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38268] gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris
2008-11-25 21:47 [Bug fortran/38268] New: gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris mt1 at systella dot fr
2008-11-26 3:54 ` [Bug fortran/38268] " jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-26 7:19 ` mt1 at systella dot fr
@ 2008-11-26 7:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-26 8:07 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-26 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 07:48 -------
> I have been given access to a mchine with this architecture and have not,
> after several evenings at it, been able to complete a single build of
> gfortran.
Weird, folks generally can build it flawlessly, see the various build pages:
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.1/buildstat.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.2/buildstat.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html
You indeed need to follow the build instructions. What happens exactly?
> I suspect there are some configuration issues going on here that we need to
> nail down. Do we have a "solaris" gcc maintainer around?
I'm the SPARC/Solaris maintainer. The Fortran compiler has been working fine
on this platform since 4.0.0, like on every other primary platforms.
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38268
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38268] gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris
2008-11-25 21:47 [Bug fortran/38268] New: gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris mt1 at systella dot fr
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-26 7:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-26 8:07 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-26 8:28 ` mt1 at systella dot fr
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-26 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 08:05 -------
> There is no error on link stage, but gfortran tries to link program with 32
> bits libraries, not with 64 bits one even I force -m64.
Not quite. The binary is correctly linked against 64-bit libraries, but the
-R path is not set by default. You need to set it or set LD_LIBRARY_PATH:
(botcazou@ob) ~ $ gfortran -m64 test.f90
(botcazou@ob) ~ $ ./a.out
ld.so.1: ./a.out: fatal:
/nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/install_sparc/lib/libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF
class: ELFCLASS32
Killed
(botcazou@ob) ~ $ gfortran -m64 test.f90
-Wl,-R,/nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/install_sparc/lib/sparcv9
(botcazou@ob) ~ $ ./a.out
Hello, world
(botcazou@ob) ~ $ gfortran -m64 test.f90
(botcazou@ob) ~ $ ./a.out
ld.so.1: ./a.out: fatal:
/nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/install_sparc/lib/libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF
class: ELFCLASS32
Killed
(botcazou@ob) ~ $ export
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/install_sparc/lib/sparcv9
(botcazou@ob) ~ $ ./a.out
Hello, world
--
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38268
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38268] gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris
2008-11-25 21:47 [Bug fortran/38268] New: gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris mt1 at systella dot fr
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-26 8:07 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-11-26 8:28 ` mt1 at systella dot fr
2008-11-26 11:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: mt1 at systella dot fr @ 2008-11-26 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from mt1 at systella dot fr 2008-11-26 08:27 -------
(In reply to comment #4)
> > There is no error on link stage, but gfortran tries to link program with 32
> > bits libraries, not with 64 bits one even I force -m64.
>
> Not quite. The binary is correctly linked against 64-bit libraries, but the
> -R path is not set by default. You need to set it or set LD_LIBRARY_PATH:
>
> (botcazou@ob) ~ $ gfortran -m64 test.f90
> (botcazou@ob) ~ $ ./a.out
> ld.so.1: ./a.out: fatal:
> /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/install_sparc/lib/libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF
> class: ELFCLASS32
> Killed
> (botcazou@ob) ~ $ gfortran -m64 test.f90
> -Wl,-R,/nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/install_sparc/lib/sparcv9
> (botcazou@ob) ~ $ ./a.out
> Hello, world
>
> (botcazou@ob) ~ $ gfortran -m64 test.f90
> (botcazou@ob) ~ $ ./a.out
> ld.so.1: ./a.out: fatal:
> /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/install_sparc/lib/libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF
> class: ELFCLASS32
> Killed
> (botcazou@ob) ~ $ export
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/install_sparc/lib/sparcv9
> (botcazou@ob) ~ $ ./a.out
> Hello, world
Thanks a lot. I'm trying to build my project with
LDFLAGS=-Wl,-R,/usr/shared-apps/lib/sparcv9
Is there any issue to direclty fix this mistake in gfortran sources ?
Regards,
JKB
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38268
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38268] gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris
2008-11-25 21:47 [Bug fortran/38268] New: gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris mt1 at systella dot fr
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-26 8:28 ` mt1 at systella dot fr
@ 2008-11-26 11:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-03 4:08 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-11-26 11:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-11-26 11:40 -------
> Is there any issue to direclty fix this mistake in gfortran sources ?
This is not a mistake and this is not specific to fortran:
(botcazou@ob) ~ $ gcc -o t t.c -m64 -shared-libgcc
(botcazou@ob) ~ $ ./t
ld.so.1: ./t: fatal:
/nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/install_sparc/lib/libgcc_s.so.1: wrong ELF class:
ELFCLASS32
It's just Solaris.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38268
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38268] gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris
2008-11-25 21:47 [Bug fortran/38268] New: gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris mt1 at systella dot fr
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-11-26 11:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-03 4:08 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-03 9:14 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-03 4:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 04:06 -------
Eric,
Here is the problem I am seeing:
gcc -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wold-style-definition
-Wc++-compat -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long
-Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -o
cc1-dummy c-lang.o stub-objc.o attribs.o c-errors.o c-lex.o c-pragma.o c-decl.o
c-typeck.o c-convert.o c-aux-info.o c-common.o c-opts.o c-format.o
c-semantics.o c-ppoutput.o c-cppbuiltin.o c-objc-common.o c-dump.o c-pch.o
c-parser.o i386-c.o sol2-c.o c-gimplify.o tree-mudflap.o c-pretty-print.o
c-omp.o dummy-checksum.o \
main.o tree-browser.o libbackend.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a
../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a -lintl -liconv
../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib
-lmpfr -lgmp -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib -lmpfr -lgmp
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
libintl_gettext c-decl.o
libintl_textdomain libbackend.a(intl.o)
libintl_bindtextdomain libbackend.a(intl.o)
libintl_dgettext ../libcpp/libcpp.a(errors.o)
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to cc1-dummy
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gnu-make[3]: *** [cc1-dummy] Error 1
gnu-make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/delisle/gcc/obj44/gcc'
gnu-make[2]: *** [all-stage1-gcc] Error 2
gnu-make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/delisle/gcc/obj44'
gnu-make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2
gnu-make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/delisle/gcc/obj44'
gnu-make: *** [all] Error 2
Every time I make an adjustment to configure, I get some other error. I think
maybe the tool chain is broken on this particular machine.
I used this in an empty build directory:
../gcc44/configure --prefix=/home/delisle/gcc/usr --enable-languages=c,fortran
--enable-64bit --with-gnu-as --with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas --without-gnu-ld
--with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --with-mpfr=/usr --with-gmp=/usr
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38268
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38268] gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris
2008-11-25 21:47 [Bug fortran/38268] New: gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris mt1 at systella dot fr
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-03 4:08 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-03 9:14 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-05 5:47 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-05 7:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-03 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-03 09:12 -------
> gcc -g -fkeep-inline-functions -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings
> -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wold-style-definition
> -Wc++-compat -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long
> -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -o
> cc1-dummy c-lang.o stub-objc.o attribs.o c-errors.o c-lex.o c-pragma.o c-decl.o
> c-typeck.o c-convert.o c-aux-info.o c-common.o c-opts.o c-format.o
> c-semantics.o c-ppoutput.o c-cppbuiltin.o c-objc-common.o c-dump.o c-pch.o
> c-parser.o i386-c.o sol2-c.o c-gimplify.o tree-mudflap.o c-pretty-print.o
> c-omp.o dummy-checksum.o \
> main.o tree-browser.o libbackend.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a
> ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a -lintl -liconv
> ../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib
> -lmpfr -lgmp -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib -lmpfr -lgmp
> Undefined first referenced
> symbol in file
> libintl_gettext c-decl.o
> libintl_textdomain libbackend.a(intl.o)
> libintl_bindtextdomain libbackend.a(intl.o)
> libintl_dgettext ../libcpp/libcpp.a(errors.o)
> ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to cc1-dummy
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> gnu-make[3]: *** [cc1-dummy] Error 1
> gnu-make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/delisle/gcc/obj44/gcc'
> gnu-make[2]: *** [all-stage1-gcc] Error 2
> gnu-make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/delisle/gcc/obj44'
> gnu-make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2
> gnu-make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/delisle/gcc/obj44'
> gnu-make: *** [all] Error 2
Ah, yes, this is a classical one, see PR bootstrap/12482. You can work around
it by passing --disable-nls to the configure script.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38268
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38268] gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris
2008-11-25 21:47 [Bug fortran/38268] New: gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris mt1 at systella dot fr
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-03 9:14 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-05 5:47 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-05 7:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-05 5:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 05:46 -------
That got me farther. Now this:
gnu-make[3]: Entering directory `/home/delisle/gcc/obj44/gcc'
/home/delisle/gcc/obj44/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/delisle/gcc/obj44/./prev-gcc/
-B/home/delisle/gcc/usr/i386-pc-solaris2.11/bin/ -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall
-Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual
-Wold-style-definition -Wc++-compat -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic
-Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Werror -fno-common
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -o cc1-dummy c-lang.o stub-objc.o attribs.o c-errors.o
c-lex.o c-pragma.o c-decl.o c-typeck.o c-convert.o c-aux-info.o c-common.o
c-opts.o c-format.o c-semantics.o c-ppoutput.o c-cppbuiltin.o c-objc-common.o
c-dump.o c-pch.o c-parser.o i386-c.o sol2-c.o c-gimplify.o tree-mudflap.o
c-pretty-print.o c-omp.o dummy-checksum.o \
main.o tree-browser.o libbackend.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a
../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a ../libcpp/libcpp.a -liconv
../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a
-L/home/delisle/gcc/usr/lib -L/home/delisle/gcc/usr/lib -lmpfr -lgmp
-L/home/delisle/gcc/usr/lib -L/home/delisle/gcc/usr/lib -lmpfr -lgmp
ld: fatal: file /home/delisle/gcc/usr/lib/libgmp.so: wrong ELF class:
ELFCLASS64
ld: fatal: file /home/delisle/gcc/usr/lib/libgmp.so: wrong ELF class:
ELFCLASS64
ld: fatal: File processing errors. No output written to cc1-dummy
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
gnu-make[3]: *** [cc1-dummy] Error 1
gnu-make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/delisle/gcc/obj44/gcc'
gnu-make[2]: *** [all-stage2-gcc] Error 2
gnu-make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/delisle/gcc/obj44'
gnu-make[1]: *** [stage2-bubble] Error 2
gnu-make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/delisle/gcc/obj44'
gnu-make: *** [all] Error 2
$
I built gmp and mpfr with defaults.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38268
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/38268] gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris
2008-11-25 21:47 [Bug fortran/38268] New: gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris mt1 at systella dot fr
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-05 5:47 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-05 7:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-05 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-05 07:40 -------
> I built gmp and mpfr with defaults.
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/specific.html#sparc-sun-solaris2
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38268
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-05 7:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-25 21:47 [Bug fortran/38268] New: gfortran doesn't link any 64 bits binaries on Solaris mt1 at systella dot fr
2008-11-26 3:54 ` [Bug fortran/38268] " jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-26 7:19 ` mt1 at systella dot fr
2008-11-26 7:50 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-26 8:07 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-11-26 8:28 ` mt1 at systella dot fr
2008-11-26 11:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-03 4:08 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-03 9:14 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-05 5:47 ` jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-05 7:41 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).