public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/38358] Could not compile gcc using large include files
[not found] <bug-38358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2015-09-17 23:42 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-09-17 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38358
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
No testcase, old report. Please reopen if this is still a problem.
>From gcc-bugs-return-497468-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Sep 17 23:55:23 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-497468-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129871 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2015 23:55:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129792 invoked by uid 48); 17 Sep 2015 23:55:18 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/51270] missed warning about returning reference to temporary
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 23:55:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc dependson
Message-ID: <bug-51270-4-urxgEBfMcV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-51270-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-51270-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01446.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1127
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51270
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Depends on| |60517
--- Comment #9 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> Here's a simpler testcase for the missed warning:
>
> const int& f(long l)
> {
> const int& i = l;
> return i;
> }
>
We now warn for this testcase because of the fixes in R60517.
test.cc:5:10: warning: function returns address of local variable
[-Wreturn-local-addr]
return i;
^
test.cc:4:18: note: declared here
const int& i = l;
^
I haven't tested the other testcases here, but it seems a duplicate.
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60517
[Bug 60517] warning/error for taking address of member of a temporary object
>From gcc-bugs-return-497469-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Sep 17 23:57:25 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-497469-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 797 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2015 23:57:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 762 invoked by uid 48); 17 Sep 2015 23:57:21 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/50476] Warn of pointer set to object whose lifetime is limited
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 23:57:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.5.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on dependson everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-50476-4-zUA3JF6RAj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-50476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-50476-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01447.txt.bz2
Content-length: 857
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50476
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-09-17
Depends on| |60517
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Possibly a duplicate of PR60517, but this testcase is slightly different (it
involves assigning to global pointer and not a return statement).
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60517
[Bug 60517] warning/error for taking address of member of a temporary object
>From gcc-bugs-return-497470-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Sep 18 00:04:40 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-497470-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13500 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2015 00:04:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13442 invoked by uid 48); 18 Sep 2015 00:04:35 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/45821] no warning when returning a local variable address within a statement expression
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:04:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc dependson everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-45821-4-QalayF2xma@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-45821-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-45821-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01448.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1686
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45821
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-09-18
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Depends on| |60517
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Gaul from comment #3)
> int *function_return_local(void)
> {
> int x = 0;
> return &x;
> }
>
> int *statement_expression_return_local(void)
> {
> int *y = ({
> int x = 0;
> &x;
> });
> return y;
> }
We now warn at -O2:
test.c:14:10: warning: function returns address of local variable
[-Wreturn-local-addr]
return y;
^
test.c:11:11: note: declared here
int x = 0;
^
but only because we return y. For this testcase,
int statement_expression_return_local(void)
{
int *y = ({
int x = 0;
&x;
});
return *y;
}
we get:
test.c:14:10: warning: ‘x’ is used uninitialized in this function
[-Wuninitialized]
return *y;
^
which is a bit confusing (and not the same warning).
Possibly related to 60517.
it would be good to add the testcase
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60517
[Bug 60517] warning/error for taking address of member of a temporary object
>From gcc-bugs-return-497471-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Sep 18 00:40:42 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-497471-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 65351 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2015 00:40:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 65325 invoked by uid 48); 18 Sep 2015 00:40:38 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/24786] Missing warning on questionable use of parameter to initialize static
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:40:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on cc component version
Message-ID: <bug-24786-4-iY9ZJbFVJQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-24786-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-24786-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01449.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1569
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24786
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2005-11-11 17:59:15 |2015-9-18
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|c++ |middle-end
Version|4.1.0 |6.0
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC generates code like this:
const char *names[1];
const char *blah2() {
char x = 7;
if (first_time)
names[0] = { &x };
return names[0];
}
and we end up returning:
# .MEM_1 = PHI <.MEM_4(2), .MEM_9(4), .MEM_6(3)>
[test.c:5:17] # VUSE <.MEM_1>
# PT = nonlocal escaped { D.2254 } (escaped)
_10 = [test.c:5:17] _ZZ5blah2vE5namesD.2255[0];
# .MEM_11 = VDEF <.MEM_1>
xD.2254 ={v} {CLOBBER};
[test.c:5:17] # VUSE <.MEM_11>
return _10;
;; succ: EXIT [100.0%]
While in the non-static case we propagate &x:
;; basic block 2, loop depth 0, count 0, freq 10000, maybe hot
;; prev block 0, next block 1, flags: (NEW, REACHABLE)
;; pred: ENTRY [100.0%] (FALLTHRU,EXECUTABLE)
;; starting at line 5
# .MEM_2 = VDEF <.MEM_1(D)>
xD.2254 ={v} {CLOBBER};
[test.c:5:17] # VUSE <.MEM_2>
return &xD.2254;
;; succ: EXIT [100.0%]
This seems like a missed optimization.
Somehow related to PR60517.
>From gcc-bugs-return-497472-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Sep 18 01:03:52 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-497472-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58962 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2015 01:03:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 58899 invoked by uid 48); 18 Sep 2015 01:03:47 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/17729] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Duplicate __attribute__((deprecated)) warning
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 01:03:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.0.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P5
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on
Message-ID: <bug-17729-4-MDPkW92L1L@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-17729-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-17729-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01450.txt.bz2
Content-length: 4403
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17729
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed|2006-02-01 04:38:45 |2015-9-18
--- Comment #36 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Still valid. Patch doesn't apply anymore.
test.cc:6:3: warning: ‘void func()’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
func();
^
test.cc:3:6: note: declared here
void func(void) __attribute__((deprecated));
^
test.cc:6:8: warning: ‘void func()’ is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
func();
^
test.cc:3:6: note: declared here
void func(void) __attribute__((deprecated));
^
We give one warning for "func" and another for "func()".
Breakpoint 6, warn_deprecated_use (node=node@entry=0x7ffff658bd20,
attr=<optimized out>, attr@entry=0x0) at
/home/manuel/test1/pristine/gcc/tree.c:12338
(gdb) bt
#0 warn_deprecated_use (node=node@entry=0x7ffff658bd20, attr=<optimized out>,
attr@entry=0x0) at /home/manuel/test1/pristine/gcc/tree.c:12338
#1 0x00000000006c8a69 in mark_used (decl=decl@entry=0x7ffff658bd20,
complain=complain@entry=3) at /home/manuel/test1/pristine/gcc/cp/decl2.c:5085
#2 0x00000000006c973a in mark_used (decl=decl@entry=0x7ffff658bd20) at
/home/manuel/test1/pristine/gcc/cp/decl2.c:5255
#3 0x000000000077ed79 in finish_id_expression (id_expression=0x7ffff65998f0,
decl=0x7ffff658bd20, scope=0x0, idk=0x7fffffffdc34,
integral_constant_expression_p=<optimized out>,
allow_non_integral_constant_expression_p=<optimized out>,
non_integral_constant_expression_p=0x7ffff6433a4d, template_p=false,
done=false, address_p=false, template_arg_p=false, error_msg=0x7fffffffdbc8,
location=648) at /home/manuel/test1/pristine/gcc/cp/semantics.c:3607
#4 0x00000000006e9e66 in cp_parser_primary_expression
(parser=parser@entry=0x7ffff6433a20, address_p=address_p@entry=false,
cast_p=cast_p@entry=false, template_arg_p=template_arg_p@entry=false,
decltype_p=decltype_p@entry=false, idk=idk@entry=0x7fffffffdc34) at
/home/manuel/test1/pristine/gcc/cp/parser.c:4817
#5 0x00000000006f646c in cp_parser_postfix_expression
(parser=parser@entry=0x7ffff6433a20, address_p=address_p@entry=false,
cast_p=cast_p@entry=false,
member_access_only_p=member_access_only_p@entry=false, decltype_p=false,
pidk_return=pidk_return@entry=0x0) at
/home/manuel/test1/pristine/gcc/cp/parser.c:6201
(gdb) c
Continuing.
/home/manuel/test.cc:6:3: warning: ‘void func()’ is deprecated
[-Wdeprecated-declarations]
func();
^
/home/manuel/test.cc:3:6: note: declared here
void func(void) __attribute__((deprecated));
^
Breakpoint 6, warn_deprecated_use (node=node@entry=0x7ffff658bd20,
attr=<optimized out>, attr@entry=0x0) at
/home/manuel/test1/pristine/gcc/tree.c:12338
(gdb) bt
#0 warn_deprecated_use (node=node@entry=0x7ffff658bd20, attr=<optimized out>,
attr@entry=0x0) at /home/manuel/test1/pristine/gcc/tree.c:12338
#1 0x00000000006c8a69 in mark_used (decl=decl@entry=0x7ffff658bd20,
complain=complain@entry=3) at /home/manuel/test1/pristine/gcc/cp/decl2.c:5085
#2 0x00000000005de657 in build_over_call (cand=<optimized out>, flags=1,
complain=complain@entry=3) at /home/manuel/test1/pristine/gcc/cp/call.c:7578
#3 0x00000000005ed620 in build_new_function_call (fn=fn@entry=0x7ffff658bd20,
args=args@entry=0x7fffffffdc38, koenig_p=koenig_p@entry=false,
complain=complain@entry=3) at /home/manuel/test1/pristine/gcc/cp/call.c:4136
#4 0x00000000007776bf in finish_call_expr (fn=fn@entry=0x7ffff658bd20,
args=args@entry=0x7fffffffdc38, disallow_virtual=disallow_virtual@entry=false,
koenig_p=<optimized out>, complain=3) at
/home/manuel/test1/pristine/gcc/cp/semantics.c:2391
#5 0x00000000006f651a in cp_parser_postfix_expression
(parser=parser@entry=0x7ffff6433a20, address_p=address_p@entry=false,
cast_p=cast_p@entry=false,
member_access_only_p=member_access_only_p@entry=false, decltype_p=false,
pidk_return=pidk_return@entry=0x0) at
/home/manuel/test1/pristine/gcc/cp/parser.c:6419
>From gcc-bugs-return-497473-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Sep 18 01:13:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-497473-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90499 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2015 01:13:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90212 invoked by uid 48); 18 Sep 2015 01:13:25 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcc/66883] config/epiphany/udivsi3-float.c:52: bad if test ?
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 01:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget cc
Message-ID: <bug-66883-4-k4JJXojCUB@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66883-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66883-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01451.txt.bz2
Content-length: 604
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66883
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |epiphany
CC| |amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
David, you may need to CC the target maintainer for bugs in minor targets. They
do not follow gcc-bugs or peruse bugzilla.
>From gcc-bugs-return-497474-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Sep 18 01:44:46 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-497474-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34242 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2015 01:44:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 34183 invoked by uid 48); 18 Sep 2015 01:44:41 -0000
From: "Marco.Leise at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/53712] Does not combine unaligned load with _mm_cmpistri, redundant instruction at -O0
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 01:44:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.6.3
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Marco.Leise at gmx dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-53712-4-2Fd8HETqeh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-53712-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-53712-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01452.txt.bz2
Content-length: 3027
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idS712
Marco Leise <Marco.Leise at gmx dot de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Marco.Leise at gmx dot de
--- Comment #9 from Marco Leise <Marco.Leise at gmx dot de> ---
If this was fixed three years ago, then how does the same test program produce
this assembly with gcc 5.2.0 (and earlier)?
Dump of assembler code for function test:
0x0000000000400596 <+0>: push rbp
0x0000000000400597 <+1>: mov rbp,rsp
0x000000000040059a <+4>: mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x28],rdi
0x000000000040059e <+8>: mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x30],rsi
0x00000000004005a2 <+12>: mov rax,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x30]
0x00000000004005a6 <+16>: mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x18],rax
0x00000000004005aa <+20>: mov rax,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x18]
0x00000000004005ae <+24>: movdqu xmm0,XMMWORD PTR [rax]
0x00000000004005b2 <+28>: movaps XMMWORD PTR [rbp-0x10],xmm0
0x00000000004005b6 <+32>: mov rax,QWORD PTR [rbp-0x28]
=> 0x00000000004005ba <+36>: movdqa xmm0,XMMWORD PTR [rax]
0x00000000004005be <+40>: movdqa xmm1,xmm0
0x00000000004005c2 <+44>: movdqa xmm0,XMMWORD PTR [rbp-0x10]
0x00000000004005c7 <+49>: pcmpistri xmm0,xmm1,0x0
0x00000000004005cd <+55>: mov eax,ecx
0x00000000004005cf <+57>: pcmpistrm xmm0,xmm1,0x0
0x00000000004005d5 <+63>: pop rbp
0x00000000004005d6 <+64>: ret
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/5.2.0/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.2.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-5.2.0/work/gcc-5.2.0/configure
--host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --prefix=/usr
--bindir=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/5.2.0
--includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.2.0/include
--datadir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.2.0
--mandir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.2.0/man
--infodir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.2.0/info
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.2.0/include/g++-v5
--with-python-dir=/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.2.0/python
--enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-obsolete --enable-secureplt --disable-werror
--with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext
--enable-checking=release --with-bugurl=https://bugs.gentoo.org/
--with-pkgversion='Gentoo 5.2.0 p1.1, pie-0.6.4' --enable-libstdcxx-time
--enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit
--enable-clocale=gnu --enable-multilib --with-multilib-list=m32,m64
--disable-altivec --disable-fixed-point --enable-targets=all --disable-libgcj
--enable-libgomp --disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --disable-libcilkrts
--disable-libquadmath --enable-lto --without-isl --enable-libsanitizer
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.2.0 (Gentoo 5.2.0 p1.1, pie-0.6.4)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38358] Could not compile gcc using large include files
2008-12-02 0:02 [Bug c/38358] New: " ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-02 11:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-02 13:09 ` ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com @ 2008-12-02 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com 2008-12-02 13:07 -------
Hi,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
Is there any suggestion or workaround in this case in order for gcc to compile
it successfully?
I would have think its not wise to attach quite a big file over the email.
Please advise. Thanks.
(In reply to comment #4)
> If you are having a large array initializer you may run into memory problems
> and/or internal limitations. Without a testcase it's hard to tell.
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38358
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38358] Could not compile gcc using large include files
2008-12-02 0:02 [Bug c/38358] New: " ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-12-02 0:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-02 11:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-02 13:09 ` ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-02 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 11:10 -------
If you are having a large array initializer you may run into memory problems
and/or internal limitations. Without a testcase it's hard to tell.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38358
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38358] Could not compile gcc using large include files
2008-12-02 0:02 [Bug c/38358] New: " ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
2008-12-02 0:04 ` [Bug middle-end/38358] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-02 0:27 ` ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
@ 2008-12-02 0:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-02 11:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-02 13:09 ` ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-02 0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 00:29 -------
Wait how are you using debain but using Redhat's modified GCC ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38358
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38358] Could not compile gcc using large include files
2008-12-02 0:02 [Bug c/38358] New: " ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
2008-12-02 0:04 ` [Bug middle-end/38358] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-02 0:27 ` ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
2008-12-02 0:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com @ 2008-12-02 0:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com 2008-12-02 00:26 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Did you see:
> See <URL:http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> for instructions.
>
> ??
>
Yes. I am using Debian and I could not find any suitable class to lodge a bug
report under RedHat bugzilla. I figured it out that this is the closest match.
--
ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38358
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38358] Could not compile gcc using large include files
2008-12-02 0:02 [Bug c/38358] New: " ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
@ 2008-12-02 0:04 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-02 0:27 ` ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-02 0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-02 00:03 -------
Did you see:
See <URL:http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> for instructions.
??
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|c |middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38358
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-17 23:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-38358-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-09-17 23:42 ` [Bug middle-end/38358] Could not compile gcc using large include files manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2008-12-02 0:02 [Bug c/38358] New: " ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
2008-12-02 0:04 ` [Bug middle-end/38358] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-02 0:27 ` ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
2008-12-02 0:30 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-02 11:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-02 13:09 ` ahjiefreak at yahoo dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).