From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-269721-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17167 invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2008 12:08:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 16898 invoked by uid 48); 16 Dec 2008 12:06:42 -0000
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 12:08:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug c++/38541]  New: function parameter type T(*)[]
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-38541-7154@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "wolfgang dot roehrl at gi-de dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2008-12/txt/msg01599.txt.bz2

Dear all,

I would like to post a fault report for the GNU C/C++ compiler 4.3.0.

Used invokation line for the GNU C++ compiler:

gcc -c -x c++ -ansi -Wall -Werror -mcpu=603e -fverbose-asm -mbig
    -mmultiple -mstring -mstrict-align -meabi -msdata -fno-common
    -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -O3 -fno-section-anchors
    -I<different include paths>
    -D<different #define's>
    X.CPP -oX.O


// example program

template <typename T_>
bool f (T_* p);

bool g ()
{ return f(static_cast<int(*)[]>(0)); }


GNU accepts the code frgment above which is illegal. It is illegal because
a function parameter like "int(*)[]" is illegal (8.3.5/6).

BTW, the Comeau online compiler rejects the code above. 

Kind regards
W. Roehrl


-- 
           Summary: function parameter type T(*)[]
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: wolfgang dot roehrl at gi-de dot com
 GCC build triplet: athlon-redhat-linux
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-mingw32
GCC target triplet: powerpc-rtems4.9


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38541