public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/38593]  New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
@ 2008-12-21 12:50 doko at ubuntu dot com
  2008-12-21 12:52 ` [Bug target/38593] " doko at ubuntu dot com
                   ` (9 more replies)
  0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: doko at ubuntu dot com @ 2008-12-21 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

seen with 20081213, on hppa-linux-gnu, building with -g -O2 -fPIC

/home/packages/openjdk/openjdk-6-6b14~pre1/openjdk-ecj/hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:
In static member f
unction 'static void BytecodeInterpreter::run(BytecodeInterpreter*)':
/home/packages/openjdk/openjdk-6-6b14~pre1/openjdk-ecj/hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:402:
error: goto de
stination is neither a label nor a pointer
goto D.98183;

/home/packages/openjdk/openjdk-6-6b14~pre1/openjdk-ecj/hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:402:
error: goto de
stination is neither a label nor a pointer
goto D.98183;

[this message repeats]

/home/packages/openjdk/openjdk-6-6b14~pre1/openjdk-ecj/hotspot/src/share/vm/interpreter/bytecodeInterpreter.cpp:402:
internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.


-- 
           Summary: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: hppa-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
  2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
  2008-12-21 12:52 ` [Bug target/38593] " doko at ubuntu dot com
@ 2008-12-21 12:52 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
  2008-12-21 13:00 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: doko at ubuntu dot com @ 2008-12-21 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com  2008-12-21 12:50 -------
Created an attachment (id=16952)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16952&action=view)
preprocessed source


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
  2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
@ 2008-12-21 12:52 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
  2008-12-21 12:52 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: doko at ubuntu dot com @ 2008-12-21 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com  2008-12-21 12:51 -------
Created an attachment (id=16953)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16953&action=view)
build log


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
  2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
  2008-12-21 12:52 ` [Bug target/38593] " doko at ubuntu dot com
  2008-12-21 12:52 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
@ 2008-12-21 13:00 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
  2008-12-21 17:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/38593] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: doko at ubuntu dot com @ 2008-12-21 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com  2008-12-21 12:58 -------
precompiled header file at:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/tmp/_precompiled.incl.gch.bz2


-- 

doko at ubuntu dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code
      Known to fail|                            |4.4.0
      Known to work|                            |4.3.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
  2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-21 13:00 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
@ 2008-12-21 17:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-21 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-21 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
          Component|target                      |tree-optimization
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.4.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
  2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-21 17:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/38593] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-21 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2008-12-22 10:59 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2008-12-21 17:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2008-12-21 17:27 -------
Does disabling PCH fix the issue (just adding -D__disable_PCH__ should be
enough to disable PCH when building that one file)?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
  2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-21 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2008-12-22 10:59 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
  2009-01-02 11:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: doko at ubuntu dot com @ 2008-12-22 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com  2008-12-22 10:58 -------
no, same result.

btw, in the generated .ii file using -D__disable_PCH__ -save-temps, the
precompiled header is still referenced.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
  2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2008-12-22 10:59 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
@ 2009-01-02 11:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-01-04 22:08 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-02 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-02 11:34 -------
That's unexpected.  Anyway, if you move away the gch file (or directory), can
you still reproduce it and if yes, attach preprocessed source?

Otherwise it would be extremely hard to reproduce for anyone...


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
  2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-02 11:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-04 22:08 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-01-05 18:37 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
  2009-01-05 21:48 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-04 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-04 22:08 -------
Maybe the bug boils down to PR38725.


-- 

reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
  2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-04 22:08 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-05 18:37 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
  2009-01-05 21:48 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: doko at ubuntu dot com @ 2009-01-05 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from doko at ubuntu dot com  2009-01-05 18:37 -------
Created an attachment (id=17034)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17034&action=view)
preprocessed source


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/38593] [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed
  2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-05 18:37 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
@ 2009-01-05 21:48 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-05 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-05 21:48 -------
That's really a duplicate of PR38725: The code contains many lines of the form

  goto *dispatch_table[opcode];

where dispatch_table[opcode] is of the type uintptr_t which is a typedef
to unsigned int. Writing

  goto *(void*)dispatch_table[opcode];

instead makes the ICE disappear.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 38725 ***


-- 

reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-05 21:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-21 12:50 [Bug target/38593] New: [4.4 regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 12:52 ` [Bug target/38593] " doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 12:52 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 13:00 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2008-12-21 17:27 ` [Bug tree-optimization/38593] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-21 17:28 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-12-22 10:59 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2009-01-02 11:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-04 22:08 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-05 18:37 ` doko at ubuntu dot com
2009-01-05 21:48 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).