From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-407305-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 7886 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2012 21:01:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 6578 invoked by uid 48); 20 Nov 2012 21:00:59 -0000
From: "izamyatin at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/38785] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] huge performance regression on EEMBC bitmnp01
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 21:01:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: izamyatin at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-38785-4-FNXw5Ab4TE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-38785-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-38785-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg01967.txt.bz2


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38785

--- Comment #34 from Igor Zamyatin <izamyatin at gmail dot com> 2012-11-20 21:00:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> Would be possible to double check if this problem is still fixed after the fix
> to the tree-ssa-pre patch?

Unfortunately the regression happened after the fix...