public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/38905]  New: [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
@ 2009-01-18 15:34 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-01-18 15:42 ` [Bug middle-end/38905] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (16 more replies)
  0 siblings, 17 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

On Linux/x86-64, gcc 4.3.3 revision 143474 miscompiled 464.h264ref in
SPEC CPU 2006 at -O2 -ffast-math:

  Running 464.h264ref ref base o2 default
Error with
'/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/spec/2006/x86_64/spec/bin/specinvoke
rt/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/spec/2006/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/r
ref_o2.0000 -c 1 -e compare.err -o compare.stdout -f compare.cmd': check file
'/
mport/svn/gcc-test/spec/2006/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/run/run_b
000/.err'
*** Miscompare of foreman_ref_main_leakybucketparam.cfg, see
/export/gnu/import/
/spec/2006/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/run/run_base_ref_o2.0000/fo
in_leakybucketparam.cfg.mis
*** Miscompare of foreman_ref_main_encodelog.out, see
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc
006/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/run/run_base_ref_o2.0000/foreman_r
delog.out.mis
*** Miscompare of sss_main_encodelog.out, see
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/sp
64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/run/run_base_ref_o2.0000/sss_main_encodelo
*** Miscompare of foreman_ref_baseline_encodelog.out, see
/export/gnu/import/svn
ec/2006/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/run/run_base_ref_o2.0000/forem
ine_encodelog.out.mis
*** Miscompare of sss_main_leakybucketparam.cfg, see
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-
06/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/run/run_base_ref_o2.0000/sss_main_l
ram.cfg.mis
*** Miscompare of foreman_ref_baseline_leakybucketparam.cfg, see
/export/gnu/imp
test/spec/2006/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/run/run_base_ref_o2.000
f_baseline_leakybucketparam.cfg.mis

We are trying to find a smaller testcase as well as which
checkin caused this.


-- 
           Summary: [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006
                    miscompiled
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
GCC target triplet: x86-64-unknown-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 15:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-01-18 17:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.3.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-01-18 15:42 ` [Bug middle-end/38905] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-18 17:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-01-18 17:19 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-01-18 17:16 -------
It is caused by revision 142040:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-11/msg00541.html


-- 

hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|4.3.3                       |---


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-01-18 15:42 ` [Bug middle-end/38905] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-01-18 17:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 17:19 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-01-18 17:19 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> It is caused by revision 142040:
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-11/msg00541.html
> 

The patch is at

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg01040.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de
@ 2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-01-18 17:40 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.3.3


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-18 17:19 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de
  2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenther at suse dot de @ 2009-01-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de  2009-01-18 17:21 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC
 CPU 2006 miscompiled

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:

> ------- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-01-18 17:19 -------
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > It is caused by revision 142040:
> > 
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-11/msg00541.html
> > 
> 
> The patch is at
> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg01040.html

Can you check if it is fixed by -fno-strict-aliasing and/or
--param max-fields-for-field-sensitive=0?  I suspect we need to
backport some PTA fixes :/

Richard.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-18 17:40 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-01-18 17:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-01-18 17:39 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Can you check if it is fixed by -fno-strict-aliasing and/or
> --param max-fields-for-field-sensitive=0?  I suspect we need to
> backport some PTA fixes :/
> 

Either -fno-strict-aliasing or --param max-fields-for-field-sensitive=0
fixed this.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-18 17:40 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 17:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de
  2009-01-18 19:09 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenther at suse dot de @ 2009-01-18 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de  2009-01-18 17:42 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC
 CPU 2006 miscompiled

On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:

> ------- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-01-18 17:39 -------
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Can you check if it is fixed by -fno-strict-aliasing and/or
> > --param max-fields-for-field-sensitive=0?  I suspect we need to
> > backport some PTA fixes :/
> > 
> 
> Either -fno-strict-aliasing or --param max-fields-for-field-sensitive=0
> fixed this.

I would guess that

2008-11-25  Daniel Berlin  <dberlin@dberlin.org>
            Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>

        PR tree-optimization/37869
        * tree-ssa-structalias.c (struct constraint_graph): Remove
        pt_used and number_incoming members.
        (build_pred_graph): Do not allocate them.
        (condense_visit): Do not use them.
        (label_visit): Likewise.
        (free_var_substitution_info): Do not free them.

might fix it, but of course a testcase would be nice to have.

Thx for tracking this down btw.
Richard.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-18 17:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de
@ 2009-01-18 19:09 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-01-18 19:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-01-18 19:09 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> 
> I would guess that
> 
> 2008-11-25  Daniel Berlin  <dberlin@dberlin.org>
>             Richard Guenther  <rguenther@suse.de>
> 
>         PR tree-optimization/37869
>         * tree-ssa-structalias.c (struct constraint_graph): Remove
>         pt_used and number_incoming members.
>         (build_pred_graph): Do not allocate them.
>         (condense_visit): Do not use them.
>         (label_visit): Likewise.
>         (free_var_substitution_info): Do not free them.
> 
> might fix it, but of course a testcase would be nice to have.
> 

Tried it on 4.3 branch. It doesn't fix the problem.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-18 19:09 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 19:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-01-18 19:53 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-18 19:34 -------
It works for me with -O2 -ffast-math and the openSUSE 11.1 compiler which also
has this patch applied (but is based on rev. 141291).  I'm trying with plain
4.3 branch now - any special configure options used?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-18 19:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-18 19:53 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-01-18 19:52 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> It works for me with -O2 -ffast-math and the openSUSE 11.1 compiler which also
> has this patch applied (but is based on rev. 141291).  I'm trying with plain
> 4.3 branch now - any special configure options used?
> 

I am using

-DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG    -O2 -ffast-math       -DSPEC_CPU_LP64

on Fedora 9/x86-64 with glibc 2.8-10. I used 4.3 branch at revision 143470.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-18 19:53 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-18 20:36 -------
Created an attachment (id=17136)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17136&action=view)
first alias patch

I can reproduce this with the plain branch.  Attached is the first extra alias
patch in the SUSE compiler.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-01-18 20:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-18 20:36 -------
Created an attachment (id=17137)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17137&action=view)
second alias patch

Second alias related patch in the openSUSE compiler.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-18 20:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-01-18 20:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-18 20:52 -------
The testcase from PR36765 fails on the 4.3 branch.  Does it fail without the
patch for PR37868?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-18 20:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-18 20:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-01-18 21:05 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-18 20:56 -------
I'm testing the patch for PR36765 - that was a h264ref miscompile on the trunk.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-01-18 20:56:55
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-18 20:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-18 21:05 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-01-18 21:11 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-01-18 21:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #13 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-01-18 21:05 -------
Patches in comment #9 plus comment #10 fix 464.h264ref with test
input. I am running with reference input on both ia32 and x86-64.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-18 21:05 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 21:11 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
  2009-01-18 21:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-01-18 21:11 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> The testcase from PR36765 fails on the 4.3 branch.  Does it fail without the
> patch for PR37868?
> 

gcc.c-torture/execute/pr36765.c works with -O2 at revision 142026 and
fails at revision 142040 on 4.3 branch.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression]  464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
  2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-01-18 21:11 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 21:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
  16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-01-18 21:22 -------
I have verified that the patch for PR36765 fixes h264ref on the branch.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36765 ***


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-18 21:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 15:42 ` [Bug middle-end/38905] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 17:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 17:19 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 17:40 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 17:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-01-18 19:09 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 19:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 19:53 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 20:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 20:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 21:05 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 21:11 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 21:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).