public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
@ 2009-01-18 15:34 hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 15:42 ` [Bug middle-end/38905] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (16 more replies)
0 siblings, 17 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
On Linux/x86-64, gcc 4.3.3 revision 143474 miscompiled 464.h264ref in
SPEC CPU 2006 at -O2 -ffast-math:
Running 464.h264ref ref base o2 default
Error with
'/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/spec/2006/x86_64/spec/bin/specinvoke
rt/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/spec/2006/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/r
ref_o2.0000 -c 1 -e compare.err -o compare.stdout -f compare.cmd': check file
'/
mport/svn/gcc-test/spec/2006/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/run/run_b
000/.err'
*** Miscompare of foreman_ref_main_leakybucketparam.cfg, see
/export/gnu/import/
/spec/2006/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/run/run_base_ref_o2.0000/fo
in_leakybucketparam.cfg.mis
*** Miscompare of foreman_ref_main_encodelog.out, see
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc
006/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/run/run_base_ref_o2.0000/foreman_r
delog.out.mis
*** Miscompare of sss_main_encodelog.out, see
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test/sp
64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/run/run_base_ref_o2.0000/sss_main_encodelo
*** Miscompare of foreman_ref_baseline_encodelog.out, see
/export/gnu/import/svn
ec/2006/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/run/run_base_ref_o2.0000/forem
ine_encodelog.out.mis
*** Miscompare of sss_main_leakybucketparam.cfg, see
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-
06/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/run/run_base_ref_o2.0000/sss_main_l
ram.cfg.mis
*** Miscompare of foreman_ref_baseline_leakybucketparam.cfg, see
/export/gnu/imp
test/spec/2006/x86_64/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/run/run_base_ref_o2.000
f_baseline_leakybucketparam.cfg.mis
We are trying to find a smaller testcase as well as which
checkin caused this.
--
Summary: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006
miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
GCC target triplet: x86-64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 15:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 17:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (15 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Keywords| |wrong-code
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 15:42 ` [Bug middle-end/38905] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-18 17:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 17:19 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (14 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-18 17:16 -------
It is caused by revision 142040:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-11/msg00541.html
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.3 |---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 15:42 ` [Bug middle-end/38905] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 17:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 17:19 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de
` (13 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-18 17:19 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> It is caused by revision 142040:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-11/msg00541.html
>
The patch is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg01040.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de
@ 2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 17:40 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-18 17:19 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenther at suse dot de @ 2009-01-18 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-01-18 17:21 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC
CPU 2006 miscompiled
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> ------- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-18 17:19 -------
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > It is caused by revision 142040:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2008-11/msg00541.html
> >
>
> The patch is at
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-11/msg01040.html
Can you check if it is fixed by -fno-strict-aliasing and/or
--param max-fields-for-field-sensitive=0? I suspect we need to
backport some PTA fixes :/
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-18 17:40 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 17:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de
` (10 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-18 17:39 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Can you check if it is fixed by -fno-strict-aliasing and/or
> --param max-fields-for-field-sensitive=0? I suspect we need to
> backport some PTA fixes :/
>
Either -fno-strict-aliasing or --param max-fields-for-field-sensitive=0
fixed this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-18 17:40 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 17:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-01-18 19:09 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (9 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenther at suse dot de @ 2009-01-18 17:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-01-18 17:42 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC
CPU 2006 miscompiled
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> ------- Comment #4 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-18 17:39 -------
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Can you check if it is fixed by -fno-strict-aliasing and/or
> > --param max-fields-for-field-sensitive=0? I suspect we need to
> > backport some PTA fixes :/
> >
>
> Either -fno-strict-aliasing or --param max-fields-for-field-sensitive=0
> fixed this.
I would guess that
2008-11-25 Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/37869
* tree-ssa-structalias.c (struct constraint_graph): Remove
pt_used and number_incoming members.
(build_pred_graph): Do not allocate them.
(condense_visit): Do not use them.
(label_visit): Likewise.
(free_var_substitution_info): Do not free them.
might fix it, but of course a testcase would be nice to have.
Thx for tracking this down btw.
Richard.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-18 17:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de
@ 2009-01-18 19:09 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 19:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 19:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-18 19:09 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
>
> I would guess that
>
> 2008-11-25 Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>
> Richard Guenther <rguenther@suse.de>
>
> PR tree-optimization/37869
> * tree-ssa-structalias.c (struct constraint_graph): Remove
> pt_used and number_incoming members.
> (build_pred_graph): Do not allocate them.
> (condense_visit): Do not use them.
> (label_visit): Likewise.
> (free_var_substitution_info): Do not free them.
>
> might fix it, but of course a testcase would be nice to have.
>
Tried it on 4.3 branch. It doesn't fix the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-18 19:09 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 19:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 19:53 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 19:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-18 19:34 -------
It works for me with -O2 -ffast-math and the openSUSE 11.1 compiler which also
has this patch applied (but is based on rev. 141291). I'm trying with plain
4.3 branch now - any special configure options used?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-18 19:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-18 19:53 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 19:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-18 19:52 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> It works for me with -O2 -ffast-math and the openSUSE 11.1 compiler which also
> has this patch applied (but is based on rev. 141291). I'm trying with plain
> 4.3 branch now - any special configure options used?
>
I am using
-DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -O2 -ffast-math -DSPEC_CPU_LP64
on Fedora 9/x86-64 with glibc 2.8-10. I used 4.3 branch at revision 143470.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-18 19:53 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-18 20:36 -------
Created an attachment (id=17136)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17136&action=view)
first alias patch
I can reproduce this with the plain branch. Attached is the first extra alias
patch in the SUSE compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 20:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-18 20:36 -------
Created an attachment (id=17137)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17137&action=view)
second alias patch
Second alias related patch in the openSUSE compiler.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-18 20:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 20:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 20:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-18 20:52 -------
The testcase from PR36765 fails on the 4.3 branch. Does it fail without the
patch for PR37868?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-18 20:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-18 20:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 21:05 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-18 20:56 -------
I'm testing the patch for PR36765 - that was a h264ref miscompile on the trunk.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-01-18 20:56:55
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-18 20:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-18 21:05 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 21:11 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 21:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #13 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-18 21:05 -------
Patches in comment #9 plus comment #10 fix 464.h264ref with test
input. I am running with reference input on both ia32 and x86-64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-18 21:05 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 21:11 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 21:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com @ 2009-01-18 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #14 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-18 21:11 -------
(In reply to comment #11)
> The testcase from PR36765 fails on the 4.3 branch. Does it fail without the
> patch for PR37868?
>
gcc.c-torture/execute/pr36765.c works with -O2 at revision 142026 and
fails at revision 142040 on 4.3 branch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [Bug middle-end/38905] [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-18 21:11 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
@ 2009-01-18 21:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
16 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-18 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-18 21:22 -------
I have verified that the patch for PR36765 fixes h264ref on the branch.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36765 ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38905
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-18 21:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-01-18 15:34 [Bug middle-end/38905] New: [4.3 Regression] 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 15:42 ` [Bug middle-end/38905] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 17:16 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 17:19 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-01-18 17:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 17:40 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 17:43 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2009-01-18 19:09 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 19:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 19:53 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 20:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 20:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 20:57 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-18 21:05 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 21:11 ` hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
2009-01-18 21:23 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).