public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables
[not found] <bug-38966-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-08-15 21:33 ` ttignor at us dot ibm.com
2012-08-15 21:36 ` ttignor at us dot ibm.com
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ttignor at us dot ibm.com @ 2012-08-15 21:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966
Tom Tignor <ttignor at us dot ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ttignor at us dot ibm.com
--- Comment #9 from Tom Tignor <ttignor at us dot ibm.com> 2012-08-15 21:31:57 UTC ---
I ran into the related 37995 bug today (now closed as a duplicate of this one)
on gcc version 4.4.6. The bug reproduces simply by having a directory with a
"gcc" subdirectory in your PATH ahead of the directory which holds the gcc
binary. I have session output showing the repro procedure which I'll attach.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables
[not found] <bug-38966-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-08-15 21:33 ` [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables ttignor at us dot ibm.com
@ 2012-08-15 21:36 ` ttignor at us dot ibm.com
2012-08-16 6:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-16 13:00 ` ttignor at us dot ibm.com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ttignor at us dot ibm.com @ 2012-08-15 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966
--- Comment #10 from Tom Tignor <ttignor at us dot ibm.com> 2012-08-15 21:34:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 28023
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28023
Simple repro for "gcc" subdir in PATH bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables
[not found] <bug-38966-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-08-15 21:33 ` [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables ttignor at us dot ibm.com
2012-08-15 21:36 ` ttignor at us dot ibm.com
@ 2012-08-16 6:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-16 13:00 ` ttignor at us dot ibm.com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-08-16 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-16 06:58:19 UTC ---
Dup of PR48306.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 48306 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables
[not found] <bug-38966-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-08-16 6:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-08-16 13:00 ` ttignor at us dot ibm.com
3 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: ttignor at us dot ibm.com @ 2012-08-16 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966
--- Comment #12 from Tom Tignor <ttignor at us dot ibm.com> 2012-08-16 12:59:39 UTC ---
Hi Jakub,
Can you tell me what gcc version has the fix? Read through 48306 and saw
"Fixed in 4.5+" but I have a colleague here who is able to reproduce on
4.5.1.
Tom :-)
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: Thomas Tignor/Marlborough/IBM@IBMUS
Date: 08/16/2012 02:59 AM
Subject: [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1
mistakes directories for executables
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-16
06:58:19 UTC ---
Dup of PR48306.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 48306 ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables
2009-01-25 14:55 [Bug other/38966] New: " mmlr at mlotz dot ch
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-24 17:16 ` mmlr at mlotz dot ch
@ 2009-06-25 1:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-06-25 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-06-25 01:25 -------
*** Bug 40548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |psmith at gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables
2009-01-25 14:55 [Bug other/38966] New: " mmlr at mlotz dot ch
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-24 1:17 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
@ 2009-02-24 17:16 ` mmlr at mlotz dot ch
2009-06-25 1:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mmlr at mlotz dot ch @ 2009-02-24 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #7 from mmlr at mlotz dot ch 2009-02-24 17:16 -------
(In reply to comment #6)
> The currently proposed patch doesn't solve the problem where 'make -k
> check-libiberty' executed at the top level of the build directory results in
> gcc being used instead of xgcc.
That's not really the scope of this patch though. This is just to correct the
case where a directory is mistaken for an executable. The other issue looks
like a separate bug to me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables
2009-01-25 14:55 [Bug other/38966] New: " mmlr at mlotz dot ch
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-02-23 18:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-24 1:17 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-02-24 17:16 ` mmlr at mlotz dot ch
2009-06-25 1:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu @ 2009-02-24 1:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #6 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-02-24 01:17 -------
The currently proposed patch doesn't solve the problem where 'make -k
check-libiberty' executed at the top level of the build directory results in
gcc being used instead of xgcc. If you execute 'make -k check' in
darwin_objdir/libiberty, you get...
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc44-4.3.999-20090221/darwin_objdir/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc44-4.3.999-20090221/darwin_objdir/./prev-gcc/
-B/sw/lib/gcc4.4/i686-apple-darwin10/bin/ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2
-fomit-frame-pointer -I..
-I../../../gcc-4.4-20090221/libiberty/testsuite/../../include -o test-demangle
\
../../../gcc-4.4-20090221/libiberty/testsuite/test-demangle.c
../libiberty.a
whereas if you execute 'make -k check-libiberty' in darwin_objdir, you get the
incorrect compiler...
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -O2 -I..
-I../../../gcc-4.4-20090221/libiberty/testsuite/../../include -o test-demangle
\
../../../gcc-4.4-20090221/libiberty/testsuite/test-demangle.c
../libiberty.a
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables
2009-01-25 14:55 [Bug other/38966] New: " mmlr at mlotz dot ch
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-27 1:23 ` mmlr at mlotz dot ch
@ 2009-02-23 18:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-24 1:17 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
` (2 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-23 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-23 18:01 -------
*** Bug 39278 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dickie at acm dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables
2009-01-25 14:55 [Bug other/38966] New: " mmlr at mlotz dot ch
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-01-26 19:47 ` dj at redhat dot com
@ 2009-01-27 1:23 ` mmlr at mlotz dot ch
2009-02-23 18:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mmlr at mlotz dot ch @ 2009-01-27 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #4 from mmlr at mlotz dot ch 2009-01-27 01:23 -------
Created an attachment (id=17189)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17189&action=view)
Proposed fix with conditional use of stat based on HAVE_SYS_STAT_H
This only conditionally uses stat() if HAVE_SYS_STAT_H is defined. Not sure
about the indentation style at all, sorry.
--
mmlr at mlotz dot ch changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #17181|0 |1
is obsolete| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables
2009-01-25 14:55 [Bug other/38966] New: " mmlr at mlotz dot ch
2009-01-25 14:56 ` [Bug other/38966] " mmlr at mlotz dot ch
2009-01-26 19:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-01-26 19:47 ` dj at redhat dot com
2009-01-27 1:23 ` mmlr at mlotz dot ch
` (4 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dj at redhat dot com @ 2009-01-26 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #3 from dj at redhat dot com 2009-01-26 19:46 -------
Subject: Re: New: libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for
executables
Your code conditionally includes <sys/stat.h> but doesn't
conditionally enable the other code. If sys/stat.h isn't found,
perhaps the code could revert to the old access() code?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables
2009-01-25 14:55 [Bug other/38966] New: " mmlr at mlotz dot ch
2009-01-25 14:56 ` [Bug other/38966] " mmlr at mlotz dot ch
@ 2009-01-26 19:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-26 19:47 ` dj at redhat dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-01-26 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-26 19:23 -------
*** Bug 37995 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mvanier at cs dot caltech
| |dot edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables
2009-01-25 14:55 [Bug other/38966] New: " mmlr at mlotz dot ch
@ 2009-01-25 14:56 ` mmlr at mlotz dot ch
2009-01-26 19:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
7 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: mmlr at mlotz dot ch @ 2009-01-25 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Comment #1 from mmlr at mlotz dot ch 2009-01-25 14:56 -------
Created an attachment (id=17181)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17181&action=view)
Proposed fix for make_relative_prefix_1
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38966
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-08-16 13:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <bug-38966-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-08-15 21:33 ` [Bug other/38966] libiberty make_relative_prefix_1 mistakes directories for executables ttignor at us dot ibm.com
2012-08-15 21:36 ` ttignor at us dot ibm.com
2012-08-16 6:59 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-16 13:00 ` ttignor at us dot ibm.com
2009-01-25 14:55 [Bug other/38966] New: " mmlr at mlotz dot ch
2009-01-25 14:56 ` [Bug other/38966] " mmlr at mlotz dot ch
2009-01-26 19:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-01-26 19:47 ` dj at redhat dot com
2009-01-27 1:23 ` mmlr at mlotz dot ch
2009-02-23 18:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-24 1:17 ` howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
2009-02-24 17:16 ` mmlr at mlotz dot ch
2009-06-25 1:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).