From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-275123-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9024 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2009 15:10:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 8925 invoked by uid 48); 5 Feb 2009 15:09:43 -0000
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 15:10:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug c++/39109]  New: [4.4 Regression] Accessible constructor required for new
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-39109-87@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00438.txt.bz2

struct N
{
  private:
    virtual ~N ();
};

N *
foo ()
{
  return new N ();
}

used to compile until http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138355
Does it really need to have an accessible destructor if it is never deleted?
Dodji cited [basic.life]/4 which could mean this is valid.
Distilled from thunderbird.


-- 
           Summary: [4.4 Regression] Accessible constructor required for new
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39109