From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-338239-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15037 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2010 12:35:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 14973 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Nov 2010 12:35:39 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=5.0	tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:35:35 +0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC
Message-ID: <bug-39213-4-49GMuVAs3y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:46:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-11/txt/msg02972.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tromey at redhat dot com

--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-24 12:35:18 UTC ---
add_line_note adds a sentinel note

 done:
  *d = '\n';
  /* A sentinel note that should never be processed.  */
  add_line_note (buffer, d + 1, '\n');
  buffer->next_line = s + 1;

then _cpp_overlay_buffer changes buffer->cur and the test at the beginning of
_cpp_process_line_notes

      if (note->pos > buffer->cur)
    break;

then becomes totally bogus.

I guess _cpp_overlay_buffer/_cpp_remove_overlay must temporarily invalidate the
notes somehow.