public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
       [not found] <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2010-09-30 11:58 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-22 23:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-09-30 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Priority|P3                          |P2
      Known to fail|                            |


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
       [not found] <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2010-09-30 11:58 ` [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-22 23:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-24 12:04 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-22 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot
                   |                            |gnu.org

--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-22 22:46:02 UTC ---
It also fails with the 64-bit compiler on SPARC/Solaris, not just -m64.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
       [not found] <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2010-09-30 11:58 ` [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-22 23:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-24 12:04 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-24 12:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-24 12:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-24 11:44:22 UTC ---
Backtrace with Rainer's testcase on SPARC/Solaris 32-bit:

Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
0xff3201cc in _libc_kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
(gdb) bt
#0  0xff3201cc in _libc_kill () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
#1  0xff2b594c in abort () from /usr/lib/libc.so.1
#2  0x008607d8 in _cpp_process_line_notes (pfile=0xaa3568, in_comment=0)
    at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/libcpp/lex.c:871
#3  0x00869370 in _cpp_scan_out_logical_line (pfile=0xaa3568, macro=0x0)
    at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/libcpp/traditional.c:384
#4  0x00869fb4 in _cpp_read_logical_line_trad (pfile=0xaa3568)
    at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/libcpp/traditional.c:306
#5  0x0010aef0 in scan_translation_unit_trad (pfile=0xaa3568)
    at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/c-family/c-ppoutput.c:288
#6  preprocess_file (pfile=0xaa3568)
    at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/c-family/c-ppoutput.c:94
#7  0x00107618 in c_common_init ()
    at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/c-family/c-opts.c:1051
#8  0x000ae7c4 in c_objc_common_init ()
    at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/c-objc-common.c:64
#9  0x00481bb0 in lang_dependent_init (argc=5, argv=0xffbefbcc)
    at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/toplev.c:2184
#10 do_compile (argc=5, argv=0xffbefbcc)
    at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/gcc/toplev.c:2315


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
       [not found] <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-11-24 12:04 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-24 12:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-11-29  9:06 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-24 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tromey at redhat dot com

--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-24 12:35:18 UTC ---
add_line_note adds a sentinel note

 done:
  *d = '\n';
  /* A sentinel note that should never be processed.  */
  add_line_note (buffer, d + 1, '\n');
  buffer->next_line = s + 1;

then _cpp_overlay_buffer changes buffer->cur and the test at the beginning of
_cpp_process_line_notes

      if (note->pos > buffer->cur)
    break;

then becomes totally bogus.

I guess _cpp_overlay_buffer/_cpp_remove_overlay must temporarily invalidate the
notes somehow.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
       [not found] <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-11-24 12:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-11-29  9:06 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-12-17 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-11-29  9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tromey at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-11-29 08:41:06 UTC ---
Tom, what's the best approach to fixing this?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
       [not found] <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-11-29  9:06 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-17 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-12-18 17:35 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-17 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-17 10:46:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 22795
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22795
gcc46-pr39213.patch

I wonder if this wouldn't fix it (at least, that's similar to how lex.c guards
calling of _cpp_process_line_notes).  I can't reproduce it myself, so have to
guess...


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
       [not found] <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-12-17 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-18 17:35 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  2010-12-18 17:37 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-18 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-18 17:35:48 UTC ---
> I wonder if this wouldn't fix it (at least, that's similar to how lex.c guards
> calling of _cpp_process_line_notes).  I can't reproduce it myself, so have to
> guess...

The problem is that #pragma redefine_extname breaks the balance of calls to
_cpp_overlay_buffer and _cpp_remove_overlay:

Breakpoint 1, _cpp_overlay_buffer (pfile=0x104705160,
    start=0x104714050 "
redefine_extname\tmkstemp64\tmkstemp\nE64_SOURCE)\nLONG)\n& (3 - 0 >=
4))\nNned(_XOPEN_SOURCE)) || \t\tdefined(_KERNEL) || defined(_KMEMUSER) ||
\t\tdefined(__EXTENSIONS__)\n", len=35)
    at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/libcpp/traditional.c:269
269       cpp_buffer *buffer = pfile->buffer;
(gdb) p pfile->overlaid_buffer
$3 = (cpp_buffer *) 0x0
(gdb) continue
Continuing.

Breakpoint 1, _cpp_overlay_buffer (pfile=0x104705160,
    start=0x104714050 "\t
\nseemp64\tmkstemp\nkstemp64\tmkstemp\nE64_SOURCE)\nLONG)\n& (3 - 0 >=
4))\nNned(_XOPEN_SOURCE)) || \t\tdefined(_KERNEL) || defined(_KMEMUSER) ||
\t\tdefined(__EXTENSIONS__)\n", len=2)
    at /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/src/libcpp/traditional.c:269
269       cpp_buffer *buffer = pfile->buffer;
(gdb) p pfile->overlaid_buffer
$4 = (cpp_buffer *) 0x10470ad98

because in_deferred_pragma is true in:

/* Called when leaving a directive, _Pragma or command-line directive.  */
static void
end_directive (cpp_reader *pfile, int skip_line)
{
  if (pfile->state.in_deferred_pragma)
    ;
  else if (CPP_OPTION (pfile, traditional))
    {
      /* Revert change of prepare_directive_trad.  */
      pfile->state.prevent_expansion--;

      if (pfile->directive != &dtable[T_DEFINE])
    _cpp_remove_overlay (pfile);
    }

It is only reset to false in _cpp_lex_direct but this is apparently too late to
call _cpp_remove_overlay from there:

Index: lex.c
===================================================================
--- lex.c       (revision 167901)
+++ lex.c       (working copy)
@@ -1944,6 +1944,8 @@ _cpp_lex_direct (cpp_reader *pfile)
          pfile->state.in_deferred_pragma = false;
          if (!pfile->state.pragma_allow_expansion)
            pfile->state.prevent_expansion--;
+         if (CPP_OPTION (pfile, traditional))
+           _cpp_remove_overlay (pfile);
          return result;
        }
       if (!_cpp_get_fresh_line (pfile))

yields a SIGSEGV in _cpp_remove_overlay.  The obvious change to end_directive
seems to work though, revised patch to be attached.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
       [not found] <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-12-18 17:35 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-18 17:37 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-04 23:18 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-18 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #22795|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-18 17:37:27 UTC ---
Created attachment 22812
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22812
Revised patch

It passes the cpp.exp and trad.exp testsuites on 2 platforms.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
       [not found] <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-12-18 17:37 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-04 23:18 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-04 23:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-04 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

--- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-04 23:18:15 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan  4 23:18:12 2011
New Revision: 168490

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168490
Log:
    PR preprocessor/39213
    * directives.c (end_directive): Call _cpp_remove_overlay for deferred
    pragmas as well in traditional mode.

Modified:
    trunk/libcpp/ChangeLog
    trunk/libcpp/directives.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
       [not found] <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-01-04 23:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-04 23:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-04 23:20 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-05 16:45 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-04 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-04 23:18:55 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan  4 23:18:52 2011
New Revision: 168492

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168492
Log:
    PR preprocessor/39213
    * directives.c (end_directive): Call _cpp_remove_overlay for deferred
    pragmas as well in traditional mode.

Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/libcpp/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/libcpp/directives.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
       [not found] <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-01-04 23:18 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-04 23:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-04 23:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-04 23:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-04 23:18:32 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan  4 23:18:29 2011
New Revision: 168491

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168491
Log:
    PR preprocessor/39213
    * directives.c (end_directive): Call _cpp_remove_overlay for deferred
    pragmas as well in traditional mode.

Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libcpp/ChangeLog
    branches/gcc-4_5-branch/libcpp/directives.c


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
       [not found] <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-01-04 23:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-04 23:20 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-01-05 16:45 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-01-04 23:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
   Target Milestone|4.6.0                       |4.4.6

--- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-01-04 23:20:15 UTC ---
At long last.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
       [not found] <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-01-04 23:20 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-01-05 16:45 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
  12 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rob1weld at aol dot com @ 2011-01-05 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213

--- Comment #22 from Rob <rob1weld at aol dot com> 2011-01-05 16:26:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> At long last.
It was only 2 years... I have some older than that.

Thank you for your work on my Bug Report,
Rob


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
  2009-02-17  4:28 [Bug preprocessor/39213] New: [4.4 Regression] " rob1weld at aol dot com
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-06-25 16:48 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
@ 2010-07-14 17:27 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: rob1weld at aol dot com @ 2010-07-14 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #9 from rob1weld at aol dot com  2010-07-14 17:27 -------
Thanks for working on this guys, 
Rob


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
  2009-02-17  4:28 [Bug preprocessor/39213] New: [4.4 Regression] " rob1weld at aol dot com
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-06-24 13:50 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
@ 2010-06-25 16:48 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
  2010-07-14 17:27 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE @ 2010-06-25 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE  2010-06-25 16:48 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and
--traditional-cpp

It occured to me that this is only failing for me with 32-bit cc1,
i.e. i386-pc-solaris2.11, sparc-sun-solaris2.11, mips-sgi-irix6.5, but
not alpha-dec-osf5.1 (which is 64-bit).

        Rainer


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
  2009-02-17  4:28 [Bug preprocessor/39213] New: [4.4 Regression] " rob1weld at aol dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-06-24 12:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-24 13:50 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
  2010-06-25 16:48 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
  2010-07-14 17:27 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE @ 2010-06-24 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE  2010-06-24 13:50 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and
--traditional-cpp

> ------- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-24 12:56 -------
> Can't reproduce on x86_64-linux (and, #pragma redefine_extname seems to be
> handled on all targets, not just Solaris).

This seems to be extremely sensitive to command line parameters.  E.g. on
mips-sgi-irix6.5 it works (no ICE) with

$ cc1 -E -tditional-cpp include.c -o include.i -I .

When I add either -mabi=n32 or -mabi=64, cc1 aborts.

Similarly, on sparc-sun-solaris2.11:

$ cc1 -E -traditional-cpp include.c -o include.i -I .

ICEs

$ cc1 -E -traditional-cpp `pwd`/include.c -o include.i -I .

works.

        Rainer


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
  2009-02-17  4:28 [Bug preprocessor/39213] New: [4.4 Regression] " rob1weld at aol dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2010-06-24 12:20 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
@ 2010-06-24 12:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-06-24 13:50 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-24 12:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-24 12:56 -------
Can't reproduce on x86_64-linux (and, #pragma redefine_extname seems to be
handled on all targets, not just Solaris).


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
  2009-02-17  4:28 [Bug preprocessor/39213] New: [4.4 Regression] " rob1weld at aol dot com
  2010-06-21 12:36 ` [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] " ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-06-24 11:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-24 12:20 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
  2010-06-24 12:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE @ 2010-06-24 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE  2010-06-24 12:20 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and
--traditional-cpp

> ------- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-24 11:51 -------

> created.  But, as this PR lacks a testcase (well, the testcase depends on a
> proprietary header file not included here), it is hard to guess what's going
> on.

I could include the OpenSolaris header, which is licensed under CDDL,
but I've just been able to construct a minimal testcase:

$ cat include.c
#include <stdlib.h>
$ cat stdlib.h
#pragma redefine_extname        mkstemp64       mkstemp
$ ./cc1 -E -traditional-cpp ./include.c -o include.i -I . -m64
In file included from ./include.c:2:0:
./stdlib.h:1:0: internal compiler error: Abort

This should make it easier to find what's going on.  Unlike the original
test case from the GCC testsuite, this one fails even without -m64.

        Rainer


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
  2009-02-17  4:28 [Bug preprocessor/39213] New: [4.4 Regression] " rob1weld at aol dot com
  2010-06-21 12:36 ` [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] " ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-24 11:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-06-24 12:20 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-24 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-24 11:51 -------
note->type == 10 is:
  *d = '\n';
  /* A sentinel note that should never be processed.  */
  add_line_note (buffer, d + 1, '\n');
  buffer->next_line = s + 1;
created.  But, as this PR lacks a testcase (well, the testcase depends on a
proprietary header file not included here), it is hard to guess what's going
on.
Can you see if doing just
cp /usr/include/stdlib.h /tmp/stdlib.h
gcc -E -traditional-cpp /tmp/stdlib.h
If yes, can you distill a smaller testcase from it (ideally at most a few
lines)?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

* [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp
  2009-02-17  4:28 [Bug preprocessor/39213] New: [4.4 Regression] " rob1weld at aol dot com
@ 2010-06-21 12:36 ` ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-06-24 11:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-06-21 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-06-21 12:35 -------
Updated summary (you list the regressed branches to fix, not the working one).


-- 

ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to fail|4.4.0 4.5.0                 |4.4.5 4.5.1 4.6.0
      Known to work|3.4.3                       |3.4.6
            Summary|Regression [3.4.3]          |[4.4/4.5/4.6 regression]
                   |Preprocessor ICE with -m64  |Preprocessor ICE with -m64
                   |and --traditional-cpp       |and --traditional-cpp
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.6.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-05 16:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-39213-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-09-30 11:58 ` [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] Preprocessor ICE with -m64 and --traditional-cpp rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-22 23:17 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-24 12:04 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-24 12:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-11-29  9:06 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-17 10:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-18 17:35 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-18 17:37 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-04 23:18 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-04 23:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-04 23:19 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-04 23:20 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-01-05 16:45 ` rob1weld at aol dot com
2009-02-17  4:28 [Bug preprocessor/39213] New: [4.4 Regression] " rob1weld at aol dot com
2010-06-21 12:36 ` [Bug preprocessor/39213] [4.4/4.5/4.6 regression] " ro at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 11:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 12:20 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-06-24 12:56 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-24 13:50 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-06-25 16:48 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE
2010-07-14 17:27 ` rob1weld at aol dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).