public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/39244] Various cleanup tests fail
       [not found] <bug-39244-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-09-24  7:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-12-11 21:56 ` sje at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-12-11 23:40 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-09-24  7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-09-24 07:18:33 UTC ---
I don't see the failures on arm-linux-gnueabi but do on powerpc64-linux-gnu;  I
wonder if this is a related bug.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/39244] Various cleanup tests fail
       [not found] <bug-39244-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2012-09-24  7:19 ` [Bug target/39244] Various cleanup tests fail pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-11 21:56 ` sje at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-12-11 23:40 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: sje at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-12-11 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244

Steve Ellcey <sje at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sje at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Steve Ellcey <sje at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-11 21:55:48 UTC ---
I get these failures when compiling for mips-mti-linux-gnu and running the
tests under the qemu simulator.  I think this is a simulator shortcoming, are
the failures on the other CPUs showing up under a simulator or on hardware?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/39244] Various cleanup tests fail
       [not found] <bug-39244-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2012-09-24  7:19 ` [Bug target/39244] Various cleanup tests fail pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2012-12-11 21:56 ` sje at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-12-11 23:40 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-12-11 23:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244

--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-12-11 23:40:34 UTC ---
Still see these on my arm box.  glibc is now somewhat old. 
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-12/msg00871.html
Box has a Marvell processor.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/39244] Various cleanup tests fail
  2009-02-19 15:55 [Bug target/39244] New: " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-05-13 15:19 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-03-20 19:22 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2010-03-20 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-20 19:22 -------
Ah - hang on a minute . What binutils are you building with ? Can you try with
a more recent binutils ? 

cheers
Ramana


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/39244] Various cleanup tests fail
  2009-02-19 15:55 [Bug target/39244] New: " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-05-13 15:16 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
@ 2009-05-13 15:19 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-03-20 19:22 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-05-13 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 

ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-05-13 15:19:02
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/39244] Various cleanup tests fail
  2009-02-19 15:55 [Bug target/39244] New: " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-02-19 16:06 ` [Bug target/39244] " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-05-13 14:40 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-05-13 15:16 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
  2009-05-13 15:19 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-03-20 19:22 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca @ 2009-05-13 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca  2009-05-13 15:16 -------
Subject: Re:  Various cleanup tests fail

> I don't see these failing with trunk as of 147209 or on an
> arm-none-linux-gnueabi 4.4.x on the testresults mailing list. Do these still
> fail for your tester?

Yes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-05/msg01013.html

Dave


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/39244] Various cleanup tests fail
  2009-02-19 15:55 [Bug target/39244] New: " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-02-19 16:06 ` [Bug target/39244] " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-05-13 14:40 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-05-13 15:16 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-05-13 14:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-05-13 14:39 -------
I don't see these failing with trunk as of 147209 or on an
arm-none-linux-gnueabi 4.4.x on the testresults mailing list. Do these still
fail for your tester?


-- 

ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/39244] Various cleanup tests fail
  2009-02-19 15:55 [Bug target/39244] New: " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-19 16:06 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-05-13 14:40 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-19 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-19 16:06 -------
(gdb) p i
$6 = 4
(gdb) p/x mask
$8 = 0x4ff0
(gdb) p/x ((phase1_vrs *)context)->core.r
$11 = {0x0, 0x0, 0xe, 0x817, 0x0, 0x0, 0xbee108d4, 0x0, 0x0, 0x861c, 0x0,
  0x84bc, 0x0, 0x1c, 0x0, 0x40025000}

R_SP is 13.  So, the problem is with the context.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39244


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-11 23:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-39244-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-09-24  7:19 ` [Bug target/39244] Various cleanup tests fail pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-11 21:56 ` sje at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-12-11 23:40 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2009-02-19 15:55 [Bug target/39244] New: " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-19 16:06 ` [Bug target/39244] " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-13 14:40 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-05-13 15:16 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
2009-05-13 15:19 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-03-20 19:22 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).