public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/39283] volatile data types ignore __attribute__ ((__aligned ...))
       [not found] <bug-39283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2012-05-25  6:40 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-05-25  6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39283

Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
            Version|4.3.3                       |4.7.1
         Resolution|                            |FIXED
      Known to fail|                            |

--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-05-25 06:04:33 UTC ---
Seems to be gone on "[gcc-4_7-branch revision 185763]" for
crisv32-axis-linux-gnu
as well as for cris-elf with "[trunk revision 187855]" (16, 16, 16, 16) so
let's close this.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/39283] volatile data types ignore __attribute__ ((__aligned ...))
  2009-02-23 22:40 [Bug target/39283] New: " hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2009-02-23 22:48 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-23 22:57 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-23 22:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-23 22:56 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> But sure, middle-end instead of target is then
> more consistent.

...or "c".  Whatever!


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39283


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/39283] volatile data types ignore __attribute__ ((__aligned ...))
  2009-02-23 22:40 [Bug target/39283] New: " hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-02-23 22:44 ` [Bug c/39283] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-02-23 22:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-23 22:48 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-02-23 22:57 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-23 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #3 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-23 22:48 -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> So the cris problem with 1 vs 4 might be a different issue but the C front-end
> does something incorrectly anyways.

I was assuming it's the same basic problem, if nothing else that assumption
simplified bug-reporting. :) But sure, middle-end instead of target is then
more consistent.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39283


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/39283] volatile data types ignore __attribute__ ((__aligned ...))
  2009-02-23 22:40 [Bug target/39283] New: " hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-02-23 22:44 ` [Bug c/39283] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-23 22:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-02-23 22:48 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-02-23 22:57 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-23 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-23 22:45 -------
So the cris problem with 1 vs 4 might be a different issue but the C front-end
does something incorrectly anyways.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39283


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug c/39283] volatile data types ignore __attribute__ ((__aligned ...))
  2009-02-23 22:40 [Bug target/39283] New: " hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2009-02-23 22:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2009-02-23 22:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-02-23 22:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-23 22:43 -------
This works correctly with the C++ front-end:

[dhcp-10-98-10-23:~] apinski% ~/local-gcc/bin/gcc t.c
[dhcp-10-98-10-23:~] apinski% ./a.out
ix1: 16, ix2: 16, vx1: 4, vx2: 4
[dhcp-10-98-10-23:~] apinski% ~/local-gcc/bin/g++ t.c
./[dhcp-10-98-10-23:~] apinski% ./a.out
ix1: 16, ix2: 16, vx1: 16, vx2: 16


Confirmed.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
          Component|middle-end                  |c
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code
      Known to fail|                            |3.3 4.0.2 4.4.0
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-02-23 22:43:50
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39283


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-25  6:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-39283-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-05-25  6:40 ` [Bug c/39283] volatile data types ignore __attribute__ ((__aligned ...)) hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2009-02-23 22:40 [Bug target/39283] New: " hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-23 22:44 ` [Bug c/39283] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-23 22:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-23 22:48 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-02-23 22:57 ` hp at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).