From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17654 invoked by alias); 9 Aug 2012 22:44:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 17645 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Aug 2012 22:44:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_THREADED X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:44:42 +0000 From: "kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/39423] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [SH] performance regression: lost mov @(disp,Rn) Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 22:44:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P4 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.6.4 X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00529.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39423 --- Comment #25 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-08-09 22:44:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) > I'm not sure whether this should be back ported to 4.6.x or 4.7.x or not. Kaz, > what do you think? Looks a bit intrusive for the stable branches.