From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id F1C753858CD1; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 02:05:05 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F1C753858CD1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1712628305; bh=YV9R9x8+kNxv366BDph68zmbkX9D5hULQ7Qxy2kE28M=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fLU54+dtttXe5RQn6ItHR+yVV60iu2maJoXxsaKyD/S4DXYkRTXWCK1IzK5kLAQho ooWBLbQWs2jD40U6F/zmuYlgzJlHVBLcIJ+S+3duOB4ODRMweuf1TmFstejladFmlI efHRua3j1RcVUBf7hNWJYyBF3DuMBKW0Xg6PQHdg= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug debug/39436] g++ does not emit DW_TAG_try_block or DW_TAG_catch_block Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 02:05:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: debug X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D39436 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > for try blocks, I do need the catch blocks so do it as the siblings. > For catch blocks, the child will be type that is being caught as a > DW_TAG_formal_parameter/DW_TAG_unspecified_parameters . Note DW_TAG_unspecified_parameters is for the catch(...) case. I am adding this more for my usage when I am coding this up to make sure I understand how this works.=