public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/39437] Support for automatic linking via pragma
       [not found] <bug-39437-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-02-11 16:44 ` olafvdspek at gmail dot com
  2011-02-11 17:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: olafvdspek at gmail dot com @ 2011-02-11 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437

--- Comment #3 from Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek at gmail dot com> 2011-02-11 16:42:45 UTC ---
Somebody?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/39437] Support for automatic linking via pragma
       [not found] <bug-39437-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2011-02-11 16:44 ` [Bug c++/39437] Support for automatic linking via pragma olafvdspek at gmail dot com
@ 2011-02-11 17:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-02-11 17:10 ` olafvdspek at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-11 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437

Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX

--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-11 16:59:20 UTC ---
There is no infrastructure that can be (re-)used for this.  So no, this doesn't
seem worth the effort.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/39437] Support for automatic linking via pragma
       [not found] <bug-39437-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
  2011-02-11 16:44 ` [Bug c++/39437] Support for automatic linking via pragma olafvdspek at gmail dot com
  2011-02-11 17:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-11 17:10 ` olafvdspek at gmail dot com
  2011-02-11 19:38 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-02-12 15:48 ` olafvdspek at gmail dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: olafvdspek at gmail dot com @ 2011-02-11 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437

--- Comment #5 from Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek at gmail dot com> 2011-02-11 17:06:57 UTC ---
Why not? It doesn't seem too complex to me. The compiler writes a comment to
the object file, the linker reads this.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/39437] Support for automatic linking via pragma
       [not found] <bug-39437-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-02-11 17:10 ` olafvdspek at gmail dot com
@ 2011-02-11 19:38 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
  2011-02-12 15:48 ` olafvdspek at gmail dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-11 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |manu at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-11 19:28:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Why not? It doesn't seem too complex to me. The compiler writes a comment to
> the object file, the linker reads this.

If it doesn't seem very complex, please go ahead and implement it: 

http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html

http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC_Research

I am saying this without any bad attitude, there is so many things that would
benefit GCC but they are not a priority for the main devs, so GCC needs as much
help as it can get anyway.

If you are interested, I am sure people could provide pointers to documentation
where you can start from.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/39437] Support for automatic linking via pragma
       [not found] <bug-39437-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2011-02-11 19:38 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-12 15:48 ` olafvdspek at gmail dot com
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: olafvdspek at gmail dot com @ 2011-02-12 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437

Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |

--- Comment #7 from Olaf van der Spek <olafvdspek at gmail dot com> 2011-02-12 15:08:32 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> If it doesn't seem very complex, please go ahead and implement it: 

The concept is simple, the implementation may be simple but for someone not
familiar with the source at all it's far from simple.

I'll first ask people from the gold linker what they think about this idea and
have any ideas for implementation.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/39437] Support for automatic linking via pragma
  2009-03-11 21:35 [Bug c++/39437] New: " olafvdspek at gmail dot com
  2009-04-16 20:48 ` [Bug c++/39437] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2010-06-07  3:01 ` olafvdspek at gmail dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: olafvdspek at gmail dot com @ 2010-06-07  3:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #2 from olafvdspek at gmail dot com  2010-06-07 03:01 -------
Would that be a problem?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Bug c++/39437] Support for automatic linking via pragma
  2009-03-11 21:35 [Bug c++/39437] New: " olafvdspek at gmail dot com
@ 2009-04-16 20:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2010-06-07  3:01 ` olafvdspek at gmail dot com
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2009-04-16 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-04-16 20:48 -------
You need either the driver reading the object files or the linker knowing the
specifications for this.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-04-16 20:48:09
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39437


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-02-12 15:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-39437-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-02-11 16:44 ` [Bug c++/39437] Support for automatic linking via pragma olafvdspek at gmail dot com
2011-02-11 17:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-11 17:10 ` olafvdspek at gmail dot com
2011-02-11 19:38 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-12 15:48 ` olafvdspek at gmail dot com
2009-03-11 21:35 [Bug c++/39437] New: " olafvdspek at gmail dot com
2009-04-16 20:48 ` [Bug c++/39437] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2010-06-07  3:01 ` olafvdspek at gmail dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).