From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-447503-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 29733 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2014 06:56:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 29705 invoked by uid 55); 26 Mar 2014 06:56:13 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/39525] [easy to fix bug] Docs for C99 "designated initializers" isn't clear what happens to omitted field members
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 06:56:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-39525-4-ImP6qwMgO0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-39525-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-39525-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg02372.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39525

--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Wed Mar 26 06:55:39 2014
New Revision: 208835

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208835&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
    PR c/39525
    * doc/extend.texi (Designated Inits): Describe what happens to omitted
    field members.


Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi