[Bug c++/39658] [C++0x] "wrong number of template arguments" in variadic template specialization

[Bug c++/39658] [C++0x] "wrong number of template arguments" in variadic template specialization

[meadori at gmail dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39658

Meador Inge <meadori at gmail dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |meadori at gmail dot com

--- Comment #1 from Meador Inge <meadori at gmail dot com> 2011-11-15 18:35:55 UTC ---
The example case really only is passing 3 arguments.  A comma is missing in
between 'found_sign' and 'found_endian' on the specialization.  Also, this has
nothing to do with variadic templates.  You can see the same error like:

[meadori@motherbrain gnu]$ cat repros/pr39658.cpp
template <bool a, bool b, bool c>
struct T {};

template <bool b, bool c>
struct T<true, b c> {};
[meadori@motherbrain gnu]$ ./install/bin/g++ -std=c++11 -c repros/pr39658.cpp 
repros/pr39658.cpp:5:19: error: wrong number of template arguments (2, should
be 3)
repros/pr39658.cpp:2:8: error: provided for ‘template<bool a, bool b, bool c>
struct T’

[Bug c++/39658] [C++0x] "wrong number of template arguments" in variadic template specialization

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39658

Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-12-22 11:10:39 UTC ---
Ah thanks for noticing. Thus this is at most a diagnostic issue. But in fact,
modulo the - well known - benefits of the caret, EDG for example is providing a
very similar diagnostics. I think we can close this.