public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/39813] [feature request] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ addition
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-39813-4-JAX0ExSfMV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-39813-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> 2011-09-29 15:40:19 UTC ---
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39813
>
> Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle dot
> | |com
Paolo, you appear to have removed gcc-bugs from the CC list of several
bugs. I don't know how you did it - our Bugzilla is supposed to prevent
accidental removal of gcc-bugs, all bugs in the gcc product should always
have gcc-bugs in their CC lists - but please add it back to the bugs from
which you removed it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-29 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-39813-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-09-29 0:00 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-09-29 15:46 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-09-29 15:48 ` Joseph S. Myers
2011-09-29 15:48 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-09-29 15:48 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com [this message]
2011-09-29 15:51 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2011-09-29 15:58 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2011-09-29 16:54 ` LpSolit at netscape dot net
2011-09-29 17:03 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2011-09-29 17:15 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-08-18 18:58 ` [Bug c++/39813] improve __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ for templated methos lundberj at gmail dot com
2015-04-27 22:27 ` [Bug c++/39813] improve __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ for templated methods paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2009-04-19 11:27 [Bug c++/39813] New: [feature request] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ addition gcc at daryl dot haresign dot com
2009-12-29 14:55 ` [Bug c++/39813] " gcc at daryl dot haresign dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-39813-4-JAX0ExSfMV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).