From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-283023-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 5366 invoked by alias); 1 May 2009 20:25:32 -0000
Received: (qmail 4066 invoked by uid 48); 1 May 2009 20:25:19 -0000
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 20:25:00 -0000
Subject: [Bug fortran/39997]  New: Procedure(), pointer  & implicit typing: rejects-valid / accepts-invalid?
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
Message-ID: <bug-39997-13404@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-05/txt/msg00064.txt.bz2

This is a tracking bug. It partially applies directly and partially for the
almost ready proc-pointer components patch.

I first ask ask comp.lang.fortran, but Richard Maine's reply was that he sees
the problem but feels he cannot answer it:

http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/a48b6b038baabd90

I then asked at the J3 mailing list:

http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2009-May/002736.html


-- 
           Summary: Procedure(), pointer  & implicit typing: rejects-valid /
                    accepts-invalid?
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39997