public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/40056] implicit instantiation of function templates fails with -O2, works with -O and -g... Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 15:49:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-40056-4-WyYfdXpG5H@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-40056-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40056 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-08 15:48:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Assuming an implicit instantiation will happen is an incorrect. ... is an incorrect /assumption/ :) (In reply to comment #7) > Ok, thanks for clarification. The problem is that I'm not a developer of this > program, I just maintain its package for Gentoo. To make things worse I can't > reproduce the build failure myself on any of my hosts. But users continue to > complain one after another, so this issue needs to be cleared out. Looking at the preprocessed source I see that the member function template TStreamerInfo::ReadBuffer is declared in TStreamerInfo.h but only defined in the .cxx file. If that function (which is public) is called from a different .cxx file then it will be implicitly instantiated, which isn't possible if the definition isn't visible. The member function template definition should be moved to the header or there should be an explicit instantiation declaration (i.e. 'extern template' declaration) in the header and an explicit instantiation definition in the .cxx file.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-08 15:49 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-40056-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2011-09-28 22:05 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2012-03-08 14:29 ` bircoph at gmail dot com 2012-03-08 14:44 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-08 15:12 ` bircoph at gmail dot com 2012-03-08 15:49 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2012-03-08 20:45 ` bircoph at gmail dot com 2012-03-08 21:06 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-03-08 21:17 ` Fons.Rademakers at cern dot ch 2012-03-08 23:27 ` bircoph at gmail dot com 2009-05-07 9:59 [Bug c++/40056] New: " Fons dot Rademakers at cern dot ch 2009-05-07 10:02 ` [Bug c++/40056] " Fons dot Rademakers at cern dot ch 2009-05-07 12:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-07 12:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-07 13:55 ` Fons dot Rademakers at cern dot ch
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-40056-4-WyYfdXpG5H@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).