[Bug middle-end/40080] New: error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

[Bug middle-end/40080] New: error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

[marcus at jet dot franken dot de]

/home/marcus/projects/gcc.trunk/BIN/bin/gcc -c  -O3  -o dplay.o dplay.i  
dplay.i:44: error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt:
# .MEM_13 = VDEF <.MEM_10>
D.2719_6 = xcbDeletePlayerFromAllGroups ();

xDP_IF_EnumGroupsInGroup.clone.0/10(-1) [0x7fa23ece1800]: (inline copy in
xDP_IF_DestroyPlayer/3) (clone of xDP_IF_EnumGroupsInGroup.clone.0/8)
availability:local 38 insns body local finalized inlinable
  called by: xcbDeletePlayerFromAllGroups/9 (9.18 per call) (inlined) 
  calls: ff/4 (9.18 per call) 
dplay.i:44: internal compiler error: verify_cgraph_node failed
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.


-- 
           Summary: error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.5.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: marcus at jet dot franken dot de
 GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40080

[Bug middle-end/40080] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

[marcus at jet dot franken dot de]

------- Comment #1 from marcus at jet dot franken dot de  2009-05-09 09:11 -------
Created an attachment (id=17834)
 --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17834&action=view)
dplay.i

reduced testcase

gcc -c -O3 dplay.i


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40080

[Bug middle-end/40080] [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-05-09 09:21 -------
Honza, this is caused by your cgraph changes.  Likely an easier to reproduced
case than PR40079.


-- 

rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|richard dot guenther at     |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |gmail dot com               |org, hubicka at gcc dot gnu
                   |                            |dot org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
           Keywords|                            |ice-checking, ice-on-valid-
                   |                            |code
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2009-05-09 09:21:42
               date|                            |
            Summary|error: missing callgraph    |[4.5 Regression] error:
                   |edge for call stmt          |missing callgraph edge for
                   |                            |call stmt
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.5.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40080

[Bug middle-end/40080] [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

[hubicka at ucw dot cz]

------- Comment #3 from hubicka at ucw dot cz  2009-05-09 18:52 -------
Subject: Re:  [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

Hi,
I am testing the following:

Index: cgraphunit.c
===================================================================
--- cgraphunit.c        (revision 147319)
+++ cgraphunit.c        (working copy)
@@ -1762,7 +1762,12 @@ cgraph_materialize_all_clones (void)
        for (e = node->callees; e; e = e->next_callee)
          {
            tree decl = gimple_call_fndecl (e->call_stmt);
-           if (decl != e->callee->decl)
+           /* When function gets inlined, indirect inlining might've invented
+              new edge for orginally indirect stmt.  Since we are not
+              preserving clones in the original form, we must not update here
+              since other inline clones don't need to contain call to the same
+              call.  Inliner will do the substitution for us later.  */
+           if (decl && decl != e->callee->decl)
              {
                gimple new_stmt;
                gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
@@ -1808,6 +1813,9 @@ cgraph_materialize_all_clones (void)
         verify_cgraph_node (node);
 #endif
       }
+#ifdef ENABLE_CHECKING
+  verify_cgraph ();
+#endif
   cgraph_remove_unreachable_nodes (false, cgraph_dump_file);
 }



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40080

[Bug middle-end/40080] [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #4 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-05-09 20:10 -------
Subject: Bug 40080

Author: hubicka
Date: Sat May  9 20:10:37 2009
New Revision: 147320

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147320
Log:

        PR middle-end/40080
        * cgraphunit.c (cgraph_materialize_all_clones): Do not redirect
        indirect calls; verify cgraph afterwards.

Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/cgraphunit.c


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40080

[Bug middle-end/40080] [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

[hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-05-11 16:37 -------
Subject: Bug 40080

Author: hjl
Date: Mon May 11 16:37:07 2009
New Revision: 147389

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147389
Log:
2009-05-11  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

        PR middle-end/40080
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr40080.c: New.

Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr40080.c
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40080

[Bug middle-end/40080] [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

[hjl dot tools at gmail dot com]

------- Comment #6 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com  2009-05-11 16:40 -------
Fixed.


-- 

hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40080

[Bug middle-end/40080] [4.5 Regression] error: missing callgraph edge for call stmt

[hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-05-11 16:49 -------
Subject: Bug 40080

Author: hjl
Date: Mon May 11 16:49:17 2009
New Revision: 147390

URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=147390
Log:
2009-05-11  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

        Backport from mainline:
        2009-05-11  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu.lu@intel.com>

        PR middle-end/40080
        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr40080.c: New.

        2009-05-11  Paolo Bonzini  <bonzini@gnu.org>

        * gcc.c-torture/compile/pr40026.c: New testcase.

        2009-05-09  Jan Hubicka  <jh@suse.cz>

        PR middle-end/40043
        * g++.dg/eh/nested-try.C: New test.

Added:
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/nested-try.C
      - copied unchanged from r147389,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/eh/nested-try.C
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr40026.c
      - copied unchanged from r147389,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr40026.c
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr40080.c
      - copied unchanged from r147389,
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/pr40080.c
Modified:
    branches/gcc-4_4-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40080