From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24158 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2011 18:29:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 24147 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Oct 2011 18:29:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:29:09 +0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/40210] gcc byte swap builtins inadequately optimized Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00534.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40210 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2011-10-07 18:29:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Created attachment 25442 [details] > testcase I think those are hard to optimize really since those are inline-asm really. And the unsigned short one gets optimized correctly.