public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "shenrfen at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/40335]  New: The implement of Switch statment is against with C++ standard
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 08:13:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-40335-17793@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

Source code: 1.cpp
#include <stdio.h>
static int i;

int
main (void)
{
  i = -1; 
  switch ((signed char) i) {
  case 255:
    printf("255\n");
    break;
  default:
    printf("default\n");
    break;
  }
}

Compiling command  : g++ 1.cpp && ./a.out
result             : 255
The expected result: default  

According to C++ standard, an integral promotion of expression "(signed char)
i" should be performed firstly, the result of control expression should be
0xffff; then the label of case statment will be converted to int-type. So the
expected result should be default in my opinion. 

Thanks very much.

C++ standard:
The condition shall be of integral type, enumeration type, or of a class type
for which a single conversion function to integral or enumeration type exists
(12.3). If the condition is of class type, the condition is converted by
calling that conversion function, and the result of the conversion is used in
place of the original condition for the remainder of this section. 
Integral promotions are performed.
Any statement within the switch statement can be labeled with one or more case
labels as follows:
case constant-expression :
where the constant-expression shall be an integral constant-expression. The
integral constant-expression (5.19) is implicitly converted to the promoted
type of the switch condition.


-- 
           Summary: The implement of Switch statment is against with C++
                    standard
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: critical
          Priority: P3
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: shenrfen at gmail dot com
 GCC build triplet: x86
  GCC host triplet: x86
GCC target triplet: x86


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40335


             reply	other threads:[~2009-06-04  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-04  8:13 shenrfen at gmail dot com [this message]
2009-06-04  9:04 ` [Bug c++/40335] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-04  9:09 ` shenrfen at gmail dot com
2009-06-04  9:47 ` shenrfen at gmail dot com
2009-06-04 10:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-04 10:24 ` shenrfen at gmail dot com
2009-06-04 10:46 ` paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
2009-06-04 11:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-40335-17793@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).