public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "foo at mailinator dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/40404]  New: Comparison involving unsigned int:17 bitfield seems wrong
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:38:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-40404-17390@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

#include <stdio.h>
struct S {
    unsigned int ui17 : 17;
} s;
int main()
{
    s.ui17 = 0x1ffff;
    printf("%x\n", (unsigned int)s.ui17);
    if (s.ui17 >= 0xfffffffeu)
        puts("FAIL");
    return 0;
}

Maybe I don't understand GCC's rules for the promotion of bitfields, but it
seems to me that s.ui17 should evaluate to ((unsigned int)0x1ffff), which is
less than 0xfffffffeu, so "FAIL" should not be printed. But "FAIL" is printed.
I can't explain why; it's almost as if GCC is truncating the rhs to 0x1fffe
before doing the comparison!

Changing s.ui17 from 17 bits to 15 bits makes the test pass (i.e., not print
"FAIL"). I believe in that case GCC promotes s.ui17 to "unsigned short"... but
that should undergo usual arithmetic conversion to "unsigned int" at which
point we ought to see the same FAIL behavior happening.

Reproduced with GCC 4.2.4 and 4.3.3.


-- 
           Summary: Comparison involving unsigned int:17 bitfield seems
                    wrong
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.3.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: foo at mailinator dot com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40404


             reply	other threads:[~2009-06-10 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-10 18:38 foo at mailinator dot com [this message]
2009-06-10 18:41 ` [Bug c/40404] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-10 20:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-10 20:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-12 20:41 ` mikpe at it dot uu dot se
2009-06-13 13:56 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-17 12:29 ` [Bug middle-end/40404] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-17 12:31 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-17 13:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2009-06-17 13:07 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-40404-17390@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).