From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8987 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2011 18:11:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 8966 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jan 2011 18:11:51 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:11:46 +0000 From: "gseanmcg at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/40411] -std=c99 does not enable c99 mode in Solaris C library X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: gseanmcg at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ro at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 18:11:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-01/txt/msg00299.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411 --- Comment #21 from Sean McGovern 2011-01-04 18:11:09 UTC --- Why not introduce a warning for 4.6 that it is linking against this object file and that any other libraries alongside that are not tested against C99 may experience side effects, with eventual deprecation (of the warning) later on in 4.7 or 4.8? Is this appropriate to do inside collect2?